[Rhodes22-list] Political Humor: "I Did Not Have Sex With That Man"

[L. Sailor]

>We lost that battle when we let them vote.

Did he really SAY that???

Let me look at it again....

>We lost that battle when we let them vote.

Yes..he REALLY said that...

1). How ignorant.
2). The AUDACITY

YOU LET us VOTE?

I think not.

elle



> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com>
> > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Politics - WMD
> >
> >
> >   
> >> Bill,
> >>
> >> If you ever let the word out that we agree on
> some things, I swear, I will
> >> kill you!
> >>
> >> Let's meet in near JFK soon.  I miss you asshole!
> >>
> >> Brad
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/3/06, Bill Effros <bill at effros.com> wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Brad,
> >>>
> >>> I think you have some inkling of the fact that I
> am the most right-wing
> >>> person my left-wing friends know, and the most
> left-wing person my
> >>> right-wing friends know.
> >>>
> >>> I think of myself as a member of the
> radical-middle.
> >>>
> >>> I supported many of the goals of the Republican
> Contract with America,
> >>> and I was genuinely surprised when Republicans
> abandoned so many of
> >>> those goals.  (Term Limits?  Fiscal
> Responsibility?  Military Exit
> >>> Strategies?  Civil Liberties?  States Rights?)
> >>>
> >>> It always makes me nervous when one party
> controls all branches of
> >>> government.  I don't care which party--it's
> always a prescription for a
> >>> disaster.  And boy, did we get a disaster.
> >>>
> >>> The first thing we've got to do is provide
> oversight.  Checks and
> >>> Balances is really a good idea--no matter which
> side of the fence you're
> >>> grazing.
> >>>
> >>> Woman are going to give themselves more of a say
> on what's going
> >>> on--whether the men like it, or not.  We lost
> that battle when we let
> >>> them vote.
> >>>
> >>> Things will change.  The country will change.  I
> think that's good.
> >>> There's no excuse for the unending "spin" we've
> all been getting--that's
> >>> got to stop.
> >>>
> >>> Bill Effros
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Brad Haslett wrote:
> >>>       
> >>>> Bill,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you for quoting the Gipper.  I still
> smile when he speaks from
> >>>>         
> > the
> >   
> >>>> grave.
> >>>>
> >>>> Today is not a good day for me to "sort fly
> shit from pepper", I'm
> >>>>         
> > busy.
> >   
> >>>> We'll do this again, hopefully over beer and
> pizza.
> >>>>
> >>>> Quite frankly, in the long run it doesn't
> matter who wins this cycle.
> >>>> I use
> >>>> the term "doesn't matter" loosely.  The enemy
> may have their
> >>>> preference but
> >>>> we don't know what that is, do we?  There won't
> be a chicken in every
> >>>> pot on
> >>>> November 8th and we will not be at peace. 
> Charlie (Rangel) can raise
> >>>> taxes
> >>>> and cry discrimination, Nancy can sick the
> "dogs of law" on the
> >>>> President,
> >>>> and everyone can redecorate their new offices
> (upward and downward).
> >>>>
> >>>> We slept through the first 20 years of attack
> until the buildings fell
> >>>>         
> >>> in
> >>>       
> >>>> NYC.  This war won't be over in our lifetime. 
> Maybe Nancy and her
> >>>> friends
> >>>> are just what we need.  She scares the hell out
> of me - maybe it will
> >>>> work
> >>>> on the Islamofaciasts.
> >>>>
> >>>> Brad
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/3/06, Bill Effros <bill at effros.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Brad,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There you go, again! It's the old bait and
> switch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here's what I said:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "The Bush administration got the United States
> into this war by
> >>>>>           
> >>> claiming
> >>>       
> >>>>> Iraq had actually built nuclear weapons:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "We do know, with absolute certainty,
> >>>>> that he is using his procurement system
> >>>>> to acquire the equipment he needs
> >>>>> in order to enrich uranium to
> >>>>> build a nuclear weapon."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dick Cheney
> >>>>> Vice President
> >>>>> September 8, 2002"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We did not go to war over mustard gas. The
> administration tried that,
> >>>>> and it did not work.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We had provided Iraq with WMD, and we had
> authorized Saddam Hussein
> >>>>>           
> > to
> >   
> >>>>> use the stuff. No news there. But we also knew
> it has an extremely
> >>>>>           
> >>> short
> >>>       
> >>>>> shelf life, and what we sent was useless as a
> weapon against us at
> >>>>>           
> > this
> >   
> >>>>> point.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only way the Neoconservatives could get a
> Declaration of War
> >>>>>           
> >>> against
> >>>       
> >>>>> Iraq (a stated goal as early as 1991) was by
> claiming--falsely--that
> >>>>> Iraq was trying to build Nuclear Weapons, and
> that we had to invade
> >>>>>           
> >>> them
> >>>       
> >>>>> before they could drop the Nucs on us. The
> highly secretive Bush
> >>>>> Administration claimed it had absolute proof,
> but refused to show it
> >>>>>           
> > to
> >   
> >>>>> anyone, and branded people who disputed their
> claim as "traitors" for
> >>>>> not believing the "Commander-in-Chief".
> >>>>>
> 
=== message truncated ===



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business 
(http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com)