[Rhodes22-list] Political Humor: "I Did Not Have Sex With That
Man"
Bill Effros
bill at effros.com
Fri Nov 3 21:49:59 EST 2006
"Amendment XIX"
"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."
Bill Effros
L. Sailor wrote:
>> We lost that battle when we let them vote.
>>
>
> Did he really SAY that???
>
> Let me look at it again....
>
>
>> We lost that battle when we let them vote.
>>
>
> Yes..he REALLY said that...
>
> 1). How ignorant.
> 2). The AUDACITY
>
> YOU LET us VOTE?
>
> I think not.
>
> elle
>
>
>
>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com>
>>> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
>>>
>> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>
>>> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:03 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Politics - WMD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Bill,
>>>>
>>>> If you ever let the word out that we agree on
>>>>
>> some things, I swear, I will
>>
>>>> kill you!
>>>>
>>>> Let's meet in near JFK soon. I miss you asshole!
>>>>
>>>> Brad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/3/06, Bill Effros <bill at effros.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Brad,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you have some inkling of the fact that I
>>>>>
>> am the most right-wing
>>
>>>>> person my left-wing friends know, and the most
>>>>>
>> left-wing person my
>>
>>>>> right-wing friends know.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think of myself as a member of the
>>>>>
>> radical-middle.
>>
>>>>> I supported many of the goals of the Republican
>>>>>
>> Contract with America,
>>
>>>>> and I was genuinely surprised when Republicans
>>>>>
>> abandoned so many of
>>
>>>>> those goals. (Term Limits? Fiscal
>>>>>
>> Responsibility? Military Exit
>>
>>>>> Strategies? Civil Liberties? States Rights?)
>>>>>
>>>>> It always makes me nervous when one party
>>>>>
>> controls all branches of
>>
>>>>> government. I don't care which party--it's
>>>>>
>> always a prescription for a
>>
>>>>> disaster. And boy, did we get a disaster.
>>>>>
>>>>> The first thing we've got to do is provide
>>>>>
>> oversight. Checks and
>>
>>>>> Balances is really a good idea--no matter which
>>>>>
>> side of the fence you're
>>
>>>>> grazing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Woman are going to give themselves more of a say
>>>>>
>> on what's going
>>
>>>>> on--whether the men like it, or not. We lost
>>>>>
>> that battle when we let
>>
>>>>> them vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Things will change. The country will change. I
>>>>>
>> think that's good.
>>
>>>>> There's no excuse for the unending "spin" we've
>>>>>
>> all been getting--that's
>>
>>>>> got to stop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Effros
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Brad Haslett wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for quoting the Gipper. I still
>>>>>>
>> smile when he speaks from
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> the
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> grave.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Today is not a good day for me to "sort fly
>>>>>>
>> shit from pepper", I'm
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> busy.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> We'll do this again, hopefully over beer and
>>>>>>
>> pizza.
>>
>>>>>> Quite frankly, in the long run it doesn't
>>>>>>
>> matter who wins this cycle.
>>
>>>>>> I use
>>>>>> the term "doesn't matter" loosely. The enemy
>>>>>>
>> may have their
>>
>>>>>> preference but
>>>>>> we don't know what that is, do we? There won't
>>>>>>
>> be a chicken in every
>>
>>>>>> pot on
>>>>>> November 8th and we will not be at peace.
>>>>>>
>> Charlie (Rangel) can raise
>>
>>>>>> taxes
>>>>>> and cry discrimination, Nancy can sick the
>>>>>>
>> "dogs of law" on the
>>
>>>>>> President,
>>>>>> and everyone can redecorate their new offices
>>>>>>
>> (upward and downward).
>>
>>>>>> We slept through the first 20 years of attack
>>>>>>
>> until the buildings fell
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> in
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> NYC. This war won't be over in our lifetime.
>>>>>>
>> Maybe Nancy and her
>>
>>>>>> friends
>>>>>> are just what we need. She scares the hell out
>>>>>>
>> of me - maybe it will
>>
>>>>>> work
>>>>>> on the Islamofaciasts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/3/06, Bill Effros <bill at effros.com>
>>>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brad,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There you go, again! It's the old bait and
>>>>>>>
>> switch.
>>
>>>>>>> Here's what I said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The Bush administration got the United States
>>>>>>>
>> into this war by
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> claiming
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Iraq had actually built nuclear weapons:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "We do know, with absolute certainty,
>>>>>>> that he is using his procurement system
>>>>>>> to acquire the equipment he needs
>>>>>>> in order to enrich uranium to
>>>>>>> build a nuclear weapon."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dick Cheney
>>>>>>> Vice President
>>>>>>> September 8, 2002"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We did not go to war over mustard gas. The
>>>>>>>
>> administration tried that,
>>
>>>>>>> and it did not work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We had provided Iraq with WMD, and we had
>>>>>>>
>> authorized Saddam Hussein
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> use the stuff. No news there. But we also knew
>>>>>>>
>> it has an extremely
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> short
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> shelf life, and what we sent was useless as a
>>>>>>>
>> weapon against us at
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> this
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only way the Neoconservatives could get a
>>>>>>>
>> Declaration of War
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> against
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Iraq (a stated goal as early as 1991) was by
>>>>>>>
>> claiming--falsely--that
>>
>>>>>>> Iraq was trying to build Nuclear Weapons, and
>>>>>>>
>> that we had to invade
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> them
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> before they could drop the Nucs on us. The
>>>>>>>
>> highly secretive Bush
>>
>>>>>>> Administration claimed it had absolute proof,
>>>>>>>
>> but refused to show it
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> anyone, and branded people who disputed their
>>>>>>>
>> claim as "traitors" for
>>
>>>>>>> not believing the "Commander-in-Chief".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
> === message truncated ===
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business
> (http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com)
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list