[Rhodes22-list] USAttorneygate; the chickens come home to roost
Michael D. Weisner
mweisner at ebsmed.com
Fri Oct 3 13:44:08 EDT 2008
BigAl,
Herb is correct in his assertion that the list is not just for sailing info,
but we have all been through the discussion of the charter before and why da
list is what it is.
If you are trying to conserve storage space, a problem solely the concern of
John Locke, our host, just hit delete and do not reply to the political
posts, thereby saving precious bytes that will be allocated to your reply
and those that will reply to you and so forth.
Oh, and if you are using Outlook Express or another Windows mail client, you
will need to empty your delete folder and compact all folders periodically
to conserve space on your PC. You should also run DiskCleanup regularly to
reorganize PC temporary file space.
If file space is a real problem, just go to www.newegg.com and pickup a 1TB
external (USB interfaced) hard drive for $129.99 including shipping
(http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822101121) and you
will probably never need to worry about storage space again. That should be
enough storage to archive every byte that we exchange plus all of the
digital photos you will ever take. 1TB, that's 1,000 GB or a million MB for
those of you who are challenged by really large numbers. In the "folksy"
words of Sarah Palin, "It's one heck-of-a-lot of hard drive."
Mike
s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
Nissequogue River, NY
From: "Herb Parsons" <hparsons at parsonsys.com>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008
1:19 PM
> Actually Alan, you are incorrect. Obviously, you are free to block
> whoever you choose, but your assertion the the list is "for sailors and
> sailing related correspondence, not members' political soapboxe rants
> which use up our storage room." is incorrect.
>
> The list is what the list is, not what you wish it to be.
>
> Side note - don't save the political rants, then it won't waste storage
> space.
>
> Alan Robertson wrote:
>> We have added you to our BLOCK SENDERS list. The Rode 22 network is for
>> sailors and sailing related correspondence, not members' political
>> soapboxe rants which use up our storage room. Don't bother to reply. You
>> are blocked.
>>
>> Bigal, Thor IV, Lake George NY
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Benjamin Cittadino<mailto:bigben65 at earthlink.net>
>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org<mailto:rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] USAttorneygate; the chickens come home to
>> roost
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill & Rob & Ed;
>>
>> Sen Obama has already said several times, in response to questions from
>> various reporters that Patrick Fitzgerald's job is safe. I must say
>> here
>> that I has been my understanding that the targets of Mr Fitzgeralds
>> inquiries have been Mr Rezko, and people other than Obama himself. He's
>> very
>> discreet, any anybody who says they are sure he's looking at Obama (or
>> not)
>> doesn't know what they're talking about.
>>
>> Bill's concern is well founded though. I was in law school when Nixon
>> fired
>> AG Richardson, then Dep AG Ruckelshaus for not firing Special
>> Prosecutor Cox
>> (Robert Bork ultimately did it). In response Nixon gave the famous "I
>> am
>> not a crook" speech, and the move to impeachment became unstoppable.
>>
>> As to Ed's point, I've said it as many different ways as I know how.
>> If
>> Monica Goodling made hiring decisions at DOJ for non-political jobs
>> based
>> upon political affiliation or perceived political loyalty she broke the
>> law.
>> THAT'S WHY SHE RESIGNED IN DISGRACE. Remember?
>>
>> And if the 9 US Attorney's were fired FOR ILLEGAL REASONS like not
>> bringing
>> trumped up charges against politcal opponents of a particular US
>> Senator,
>> then that's illegal and that's why AG Mukasey had no choice but to
>> appoint a
>> special prosecutor. He's done it, because not to do it would be an
>> obvious
>> malfeasence; but he has given the Special Prosecutor an impossible 60
>> day
>> deadline to produce a report. He's done the right thing with one hand
>> but
>> ensured failure with the other hand. That's why we need a clean sweep,
>> a
>> new AG, and Truth, Justice and the American Way for all. Thank
>> you....thank
>> you very much ladies and gentlemen.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ben C.
>>
>> Bill Effros wrote:
>> >
>> > Rob,
>> >
>> > US Attorneys serve the President. They can replace them if they
>> choose
>> > to do so. But that was not the issue in this thread.
>> >
>> > The issue here is "Chickens come home to roost" regarding the
>> > replacement of US Attorneys.
>> >
>> > So I ask again,
>> >
>> > Is it OK for Obama to request the resignation of a well respected US
>> > Attorney who is currently investigating Obama?
>> >
>> > What are the perceived rules in this instance?
>> >
>> > Bill Effros
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Lowe, Rob wrote:
>> >> Isn't it "traditional" (OK, not the right word) for all the US
>> attorneys
>> >> to submit their resignations at the beginning of a president's new
>> term?
>> >> Or is it just a new president taking office? Regardless, why
>> wouldn't
>> >> Fitzgerald submit his resignation along with the rest of the US
>> >> attorneys?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From:
>> rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org<mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org>
>> >> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Bill Effros
>> >> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:15 AM
>> >> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
>> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] USAttorneygate; the chickens come home
>> to
>> >> roost
>> >>
>> >> Ben,
>> >>
>> >> How do you think Obama will handle Federal Prosecutor Patrick
>> Fitzgerald
>> >>
>> >> (also on the Bush "to be fired" list -- special prosecutor in the
>> >> Valerie Plame CIA leak case) who is currently investigating Barack
>> >> Obama?
>> >>
>> >> Do you think it is is OK for Obama to fire Fitzgerald?
>> >>
>> >> Bill Effros
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Benjamin Cittadino wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Brad & Anybody still paying attention;
>> >>>
>> >>> The link to a NYTimes editorial explains in precise detail how the
>> >>>
>> >> firings
>> >>
>> >>> by the Bush administration of a number of federal prosecutors is a
>> >>>
>> >> serious
>> >>
>> >>> matter that cried out for the appointment of a special prosecutor.
>> >>>
>> >> Note the
>> >>
>> >>> desciption of the firings being unrelated to and not he result of
>> any
>> >>> performance reviews. This issue goes to the very heart of federal
>> law
>> >>> enforcement, and, in my opinion, compels a change to an Obama
>> >>>
>> >> administration
>> >>
>> >>> which will ensure the inquiry survives after January.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp>
>> >>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp>
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers!
>> >>>
>> >>> Ben C.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>> to
>> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >>
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>> to
>> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >>
>> >>
>> > __________________________________________________
>> > To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>> to
>> > http://www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>> > __________________________________________________
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/USAttorneygate--the-chickens-come-home-to-roost-tp19773205p19783502.html<http://www.nabble.com/USAttorneygate--the-chickens-come-home-to-roost-tp19773205p19783502.html>
>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>> __________________________________________________
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list