[Rhodes22-list] Bi-Gal

Michael D. Weisner mweisner at ebsmed.com
Fri Oct 3 13:50:38 EDT 2008


Bill,

What have you been smoking?  No, don't tell me, I don't want to know...

Mike
s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
Nissequogue River, NY


From: "Bill Effros" <bill at effros.com>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 1:10 PM
>I don't get it.
>
> I know I was off the list for a while, and missed some stuff.
>
> I gather some lesbian whose keyboard lacks a delete key has objected to
> soap box rants with a soap box rant and a vague threat.
>
> Some of our best sailors are lesbians.
>
> Who cares who she blocks in the storage room? -- it's really none of our
> business.
>
> Alan is a cute name for a girl.  I don't suppose she has much of a sense
> of humor about it, though.
>
> Lucky she won't see this message.
>
> Bill Effros
>
>
>
> Alan Robertson wrote:
>> We have added you to our BLOCK SENDERS list.  The Rode 22 network is for 
>> sailors and sailing related correspondence, not members' political 
>> soapboxe rants which use up our storage room. Don't bother to reply. You 
>> are blocked.
>>
>> Bigal, Thor IV, Lake George NY
>>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>>   From: Benjamin Cittadino<mailto:bigben65 at earthlink.net>
>>   To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org<mailto:rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>   Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:03 PM
>>   Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] USAttorneygate; the chickens come home to 
>> roost
>>
>>
>>
>>   Bill & Rob & Ed;
>>
>>   Sen Obama has already said several times, in response to questions from
>>   various reporters that Patrick Fitzgerald's job is safe.  I must say 
>> here
>>   that I has been my understanding that the targets of Mr Fitzgeralds
>>   inquiries have been Mr Rezko, and people other than Obama himself. He's 
>> very
>>   discreet, any anybody who says they are sure he's looking at Obama (or 
>> not)
>>   doesn't know what they're talking about.
>>
>>   Bill's concern is well founded though.  I was in law school when Nixon 
>> fired
>>   AG Richardson, then Dep AG Ruckelshaus for not firing Special 
>> Prosecutor Cox
>>   (Robert Bork ultimately did it).  In response Nixon gave the famous "I 
>> am
>>   not a crook" speech, and the move to impeachment became unstoppable.
>>
>>   As to Ed's point, I've said it as many different ways as I know how. 
>> If
>>   Monica Goodling made hiring decisions at DOJ for non-political jobs 
>> based
>>   upon political affiliation or perceived political loyalty she broke the 
>> law.
>>   THAT'S WHY SHE RESIGNED IN DISGRACE. Remember?
>>
>>   And if the 9 US Attorney's were fired FOR ILLEGAL REASONS like not 
>> bringing
>>   trumped up charges against politcal opponents of a particular US 
>> Senator,
>>   then that's illegal and that's why AG Mukasey had no choice but to 
>> appoint a
>>   special prosecutor.  He's done it, because not to do it would be an 
>> obvious
>>   malfeasence; but he has given the Special Prosecutor an impossible 60 
>> day
>>   deadline to produce a report.  He's done the right thing with one hand 
>> but
>>   ensured failure with the other hand.  That's why we need a clean sweep, 
>> a
>>   new AG, and Truth, Justice and the American Way for all.  Thank 
>> you....thank
>>   you very much ladies and gentlemen.
>>
>>   Best,
>>
>>   Ben C.
>>
>>   Bill Effros wrote:
>>   >
>>   > Rob,
>>   >
>>   > US Attorneys serve the President.  They can replace them if they 
>> choose
>>   > to do so.  But that was not the issue in this thread.
>>   >
>>   > The issue here is "Chickens come home to roost" regarding the
>>   > replacement of US Attorneys.
>>   >
>>   > So I ask again,
>>   >
>>   > Is it OK for Obama to request the resignation of a well respected US
>>   > Attorney who is currently investigating Obama?
>>   >
>>   > What are the perceived rules in this instance?
>>   >
>>   > Bill Effros
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   >
>>   > Lowe, Rob wrote:
>>   >> Isn't it "traditional" (OK, not the right word) for all the US 
>> attorneys
>>   >> to submit their resignations at the beginning of a president's new 
>> term?
>>   >> Or is it just a new president taking office?  Regardless, why 
>> wouldn't
>>   >> Fitzgerald submit his resignation along with the rest of the US
>>   >> attorneys?
>>   >>
>>   >>
>>   >> -----Original Message-----
>>   >> From: 
>> rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org<mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org>
>>   >> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Bill Effros
>>   >> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:15 AM
>>   >> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
>>   >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] USAttorneygate; the chickens come home 
>> to
>>   >> roost
>>   >>
>>   >> Ben,
>>   >>
>>   >> How do you think Obama will handle Federal Prosecutor Patrick 
>> Fitzgerald
>>   >>
>>   >> (also on the Bush "to be fired" list -- special prosecutor in the
>>   >> Valerie Plame CIA leak case) who is currently investigating Barack
>>   >> Obama?
>>   >>
>>   >> Do you think it is is OK for Obama to fire Fitzgerald?
>>   >>
>>   >> Bill Effros
>>   >>
>>   >>
>>   >>
>>   >> Benjamin Cittadino wrote:
>>   >>
>>   >>> Brad & Anybody still paying attention;
>>   >>>
>>   >>> The link to a NYTimes editorial explains in precise detail how the
>>   >>>
>>   >> firings
>>   >>
>>   >>> by the Bush administration of a number of federal prosecutors is a
>>   >>>
>>   >> serious
>>   >>
>>   >>> matter that cried out for the appointment of a special prosecutor.
>>   >>>
>>   >> Note the
>>   >>
>>   >>> desciption of the firings being unrelated to and not he result of 
>> any
>>   >>> performance reviews. This issue goes to the very heart of federal 
>> law
>>   >>> enforcement, and, in my opinion, compels a change to an Obama
>>   >>>
>>   >> administration
>>   >>
>>   >>> which will ensure the inquiry survives after January.
>>   >>>
>>   >>> 
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp>
>>   >>> 
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp>
>>   >>>
>>   >>> Cheers!
>>   >>>
>>   >>> Ben C.
>>   >>>
>>   >>>
>>   >> __________________________________________________
>>   >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go 
>> to
>>   >> http://www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>>   >> __________________________________________________
>>   >>
>>   >> __________________________________________________
>>   >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go 
>> to
>>   >> http://www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>>   >> __________________________________________________
>>   >>
>>   >>
>>   > __________________________________________________
>>   > To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go 
>> to
>>   > http://www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>>   > __________________________________________________
>>   >
>>   >
>>
>>   -- 
>>   View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/USAttorneygate--the-chickens-come-home-to-roost-tp19773205p19783502.html<http://www.nabble.com/USAttorneygate--the-chickens-come-home-to-roost-tp19773205p19783502.html>
>>   Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>   __________________________________________________
>>   To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to 
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>>   __________________________________________________
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to 
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to 
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> 



More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list