[Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Peter and Robert

[JbTek]

Ed wrote:

Bad or evil can be differentiated into degrees of badness.  Not all bad or
evil is of the same level of wrong.  A thief is bad.  A murderer is more
bad.  An unrepentant terrorist is most bad.


Ed,
My brother was robbed, then shot in the back & left to die 3 days before
Christmas. He was 37 years old with 2 kids. His youngest son shot himself in
the chest last Christmas & died.
Are you telling me that this unrepentent terrorist, who killed no one, is
more evil than the person that devistated our family?
 I don't think so.
Jb

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tootle" <ekroposki at charter.net>
To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 3:40 AM
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Peter and Robert


>
> Peter and Robert:
>
> Ayers comments published on September 11, 2001, Ayers had this to say
about
> his bombing past, "I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do
> enough."
>
> Obama keeps saying what Ayers did 40 years ago or 20 years ago is not
> important.
>
> I would have fewer problems with Obama's association if in fact Ayers was
> repentant and repudiated his actions when he was in his 20's.  Some people
> do make mistakes and grow up.  However, Obama associates with an
unrepentant
> terrorist, Bill Ayers.
>
> The above were reported public comments made just seven years ago.  Just
> after a terrorist attack on USA.
>
> Obama said he would sit down with foreign terrorist groups to resolve
> grievances.  He would sit down with Akmenijad.  Obviously he would sit
down
> with them because he still sits down with an American Terrorist, his
fellow
> board member, Bill Ayers.  He does not see any problem with terrorists.
>
> The issue here is Ayers is an unrepentant and unchanged American
terrorist.
> How can you justify supporting evil?
>
> Evil or the difference between good and bad is not defined by individual
> choice.  Moral clarity is not necessarily a religious issue.  “A lack of
> moral clarity is why people living in free societies can come to see their
> fellow citizens as their enemies and foreign dictators as their friends.”
> Natan Sharansky
>
> Evil or the difference between good and bad is not necessarily a religious
> topic.  Different societies have by various paths come to similar
> definitions of good and evil.  By acceptable definitions, unrepentant evil
> is bad.  Freely associating with a person who by most standards is evil is
> wrong.  Supporting an evil person, for whatever reasons, is assisting in a
> conspiracy of evil.
>
> Bad or evil can be differentiated into degrees of badness.  Not all bad or
> evil is of the same level of wrong.  A thief is bad.  A murderer is more
> bad.  An unrepentant terrorist is most bad.
>
> Ed K
> Greenville, SC, USA
> [no addendum for Andrew]
>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/POLITICAL---Peter-and-Robert-tp19896352p19896352.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>