[Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Peter and Robert

JbTek j.bulfer at jbtek.com
Thu Oct 9 16:02:40 EDT 2008


Herb,

no I don't.
The only reason I say he didn't kill anyone is if he had, It would be all
over Fox News.
If my brother was alive today, I'm sure my nephew would be also.
I wouldn't say he is worse, I would say he is a murderer and deserves to
die.
Jb


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Herb Parsons" <hparsons at parsonsys.com>
To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Peter and Robert


> Jb
>
> There is not sufficient information to answer the question.
>
> You are saying that the unrepentent terrorist "killed no one", but you
> don't know that to be true.
>
> In the example you gave, you included the information about your nephew.
> I'm assuming that's because you believe that the scumbucket murderer is
> also responsible for your nephew's death (and I would agree with you on
> that).
>
> By the same token, if the unrepentant terrorist has inspired and taught
> people to kill the brothers and nephews of others, yes, he is worse.
>
>
> JbTek wrote:
> > Ed wrote:
> >
> > Bad or evil can be differentiated into degrees of badness.  Not all bad
or
> > evil is of the same level of wrong.  A thief is bad.  A murderer is more
> > bad.  An unrepentant terrorist is most bad.
> >
> >
> > Ed,
> > My brother was robbed, then shot in the back & left to die 3 days before
> > Christmas. He was 37 years old with 2 kids. His youngest son shot
himself in
> > the chest last Christmas & died.
> > Are you telling me that this unrepentent terrorist, who killed no one,
is
> > more evil than the person that devistated our family?
> >  I don't think so.
> > Jb
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Tootle" <ekroposki at charter.net>
> > To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 3:40 AM
> > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Peter and Robert
> >
> >
> >
> >> Peter and Robert:
> >>
> >> Ayers comments published on September 11, 2001, Ayers had this to say
> >>
> > about
> >
> >> his bombing past, "I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do
> >> enough."
> >>
> >> Obama keeps saying what Ayers did 40 years ago or 20 years ago is not
> >> important.
> >>
> >> I would have fewer problems with Obama's association if in fact Ayers
was
> >> repentant and repudiated his actions when he was in his 20's.  Some
people
> >> do make mistakes and grow up.  However, Obama associates with an
> >>
> > unrepentant
> >
> >> terrorist, Bill Ayers.
> >>
> >> The above were reported public comments made just seven years ago.
Just
> >> after a terrorist attack on USA.
> >>
> >> Obama said he would sit down with foreign terrorist groups to resolve
> >> grievances.  He would sit down with Akmenijad.  Obviously he would sit
> >>
> > down
> >
> >> with them because he still sits down with an American Terrorist, his
> >>
> > fellow
> >
> >> board member, Bill Ayers.  He does not see any problem with terrorists.
> >>
> >> The issue here is Ayers is an unrepentant and unchanged American
> >>
> > terrorist.
> >
> >> How can you justify supporting evil?
> >>
> >> Evil or the difference between good and bad is not defined by
individual
> >> choice.  Moral clarity is not necessarily a religious issue.  “A lack
of
> >> moral clarity is why people living in free societies can come to see
their
> >> fellow citizens as their enemies and foreign dictators as their
friends.”
> >> Natan Sharansky
> >>
> >> Evil or the difference between good and bad is not necessarily a
religious
> >> topic.  Different societies have by various paths come to similar
> >> definitions of good and evil.  By acceptable definitions, unrepentant
evil
> >> is bad.  Freely associating with a person who by most standards is evil
is
> >> wrong.  Supporting an evil person, for whatever reasons, is assisting
in a
> >> conspiracy of evil.
> >>
> >> Bad or evil can be differentiated into degrees of badness.  Not all bad
or
> >> evil is of the same level of wrong.  A thief is bad.  A murderer is
more
> >> bad.  An unrepentant terrorist is most bad.
> >>
> >> Ed K
> >> Greenville, SC, USA
> >> [no addendum for Andrew]
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> >
http://www.nabble.com/POLITICAL---Peter-and-Robert-tp19896352p19896352.html
> >
> >> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> >>
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>



More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list