[Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Peter and Robert

[Brad Haslett]

Jb,

Here's a would be victim in his own words.

http://www.city-journal.org/2008/eon0430jm.html

You can draw your own conclusions.

Brad

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, JbTek <j.bulfer at jbtek.com> wrote:
> Ed wrote:
>
> Bad or evil can be differentiated into degrees of badness.  Not all bad or
> evil is of the same level of wrong.  A thief is bad.  A murderer is more
> bad.  An unrepentant terrorist is most bad.
>
>
> Ed,
> My brother was robbed, then shot in the back & left to die 3 days before
> Christmas. He was 37 years old with 2 kids. His youngest son shot himself in
> the chest last Christmas & died.
> Are you telling me that this unrepentent terrorist, who killed no one, is
> more evil than the person that devistated our family?
>  I don't think so.
> Jb
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tootle" <ekroposki at charter.net>
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 3:40 AM
> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Peter and Robert
>
>
>>
>> Peter and Robert:
>>
>> Ayers comments published on September 11, 2001, Ayers had this to say
> about
>> his bombing past, "I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do
>> enough."
>>
>> Obama keeps saying what Ayers did 40 years ago or 20 years ago is not
>> important.
>>
>> I would have fewer problems with Obama's association if in fact Ayers was
>> repentant and repudiated his actions when he was in his 20's.  Some people
>> do make mistakes and grow up.  However, Obama associates with an
> unrepentant
>> terrorist, Bill Ayers.
>>
>> The above were reported public comments made just seven years ago.  Just
>> after a terrorist attack on USA.
>>
>> Obama said he would sit down with foreign terrorist groups to resolve
>> grievances.  He would sit down with Akmenijad.  Obviously he would sit
> down
>> with them because he still sits down with an American Terrorist, his
> fellow
>> board member, Bill Ayers.  He does not see any problem with terrorists.
>>
>> The issue here is Ayers is an unrepentant and unchanged American
> terrorist.
>> How can you justify supporting evil?
>>
>> Evil or the difference between good and bad is not defined by individual
>> choice.  Moral clarity is not necessarily a religious issue.  "A lack of
>> moral clarity is why people living in free societies can come to see their
>> fellow citizens as their enemies and foreign dictators as their friends."
>> Natan Sharansky
>>
>> Evil or the difference between good and bad is not necessarily a religious
>> topic.  Different societies have by various paths come to similar
>> definitions of good and evil.  By acceptable definitions, unrepentant evil
>> is bad.  Freely associating with a person who by most standards is evil is
>> wrong.  Supporting an evil person, for whatever reasons, is assisting in a
>> conspiracy of evil.
>>
>> Bad or evil can be differentiated into degrees of badness.  Not all bad or
>> evil is of the same level of wrong.  A thief is bad.  A murderer is more
>> bad.  An unrepentant terrorist is most bad.
>>
>> Ed K
>> Greenville, SC, USA
>> [no addendum for Andrew]
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/POLITICAL---Peter-and-Robert-tp19896352p19896352.html
>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>