[Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Jay B.s post

[Jb]

Ed,
If he didn't understand...he should of.
I'm sure he learned a great deal.
I agree with you he is way lesser of 2 evils. That's why I'm voting for 
Sarah Palin for Vice President.

I have 5 new puppies to take care of. I'm up at least 3 times a night.
Jb

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tootle" <ekroposki at charter.net>
To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 5:31 AM
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] POLITICAL - Jay B.s post


>
> Jay,
>
> In an earlier post I mentioned McCain's involvement started as 
> Congressman.
>
> First, did he understand all the intricacies?  I doubt at the time he did.
> Did he ask the right questions to find out if there were problems?  I 
> again
> doubt it.  Did he learn something?  He may have learned since he was the 
> one
> asking for better accounting in 2005 of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
>
> Note that I say 'he may have learned'.  I cannot say that he did, but 
> there
> is at least some evidence that he understands better now.
>
> Second, back to my discussion of degrees of wrong.  Even if he was trying 
> to
> protect a financial investment, which I am not convinced he was, how is
> weighed against someone who acquiesces to a Terrorist?  Which would be 
> more
> evil?
>
> What are you doing up at this hour in Phoenix?
>
> Ed K
> Greenville, SC, USA
> attachment:
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p19917360/Documentations.gif Documentations.gif
>
>
>
> Just bent wrote:
>>
>>
>> McCain had also carried a little water for Keating in Washington. While 
>> in
>> the House, McCain, along with a majority of representatives, co-sponsored
>> a
>> resolution to delay new regulations designed to curb risky investments by
>> thrifts like Lincoln.
>>
>>
>> If McCains wife didn't have major investments in Keatings company this
>> might
>> be on the up& up but she did. That's not helping a constituent in a 
>> proper
>> fashion.
>>
>> Ed, do you really think after someone says there going to squeal, that
>> they
>> wouldn't back off?      He's not stupid.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ''The appearance of it was wrong,'' McCain said recently. ''It's a wrong
>>> appearance when a group of senators appear in a meeting with a group of
>>> regulators, because it conveys the impression of undue and improper
>>> influence. And it was the wrong thing to do.''  John McCain
>>
>>
>>
>> If he knew it was the wrong thing to do, why did he do it....the 2nd 
>> time?
>> Why were 3 anymore guilty than 5. They all "backed off" once they heard
>> the
>> term criminal.
>>
>>
>> Conclusion:
>> John McCain was in it up to his neck.
>>
>> Jb
>>
>>
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p19917360/Documentations.gif Documentations.gif
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/POLITICAL---Peter-and-Robert-tp19896352p19917360.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to 
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________ 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DSC01588.JPG
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 918318 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20081010/0d470ec9/attachment.JPG