[Rhodes22-list] Wally said, "... [Political][More Political stuff]
Herb Parsons
hparsons at parsonsys.com
Mon Oct 20 16:30:24 EDT 2008
Ahhhh, now I understand....
So, my wife who is white and like Palin also a racist and a sexist.
And, by the stupid asinine application to all rule, if Brad's wife is
now a citizen and tries to vote, she won't be able to vote for anyone
without being some sort of "ist".
And you know, it just occurred to me, even I would only be a half-racist
were I to vote for Obama.... Think about THAT one.
These leftist rules confuse me.... I think I'll just vote for the
candidate I think is best.
Relatively speaking....
pdgrand at nospam.wmis.net wrote:
> Herb - No. It would make him a racist & a sexist. - Paul
>
>
>> I'm curious about something....
>>
>> If a white man who claims to have legitimate issues with Obama, is in
>> reality a racist,
>>
>> Does that mean a black man who claims to have legitimate issues with
>> Palin is in reality a sexist?
>>
>> I mean, we should be fair in our stupid asinine assumptions and
>> prejudices, shouldn't we?
>>
>>
>> Brad Haslett wrote:
>>
>>> Wally,
>>>
>>> I'm pretty pissed about the last 8 years as well. W said all the
>>> right things to woo the conservatives in the Republican party and once
>>> again we were duped. The man spent money like a drunken sailor.
>>> Someone please explain to me how we're going to correct that by
>>> spending more money we don't have faster? When Jeffords (SP?) left
>>> the Republican party and tipped the Senate to the Dems I was happy
>>> because it knocked McCain off as Chairman of the Aviation
>>> subcommittee. I've disliked McCain for years. I still dislike him.
>>> He's not a conservative, never has been.
>>>
>>> But on the other hand, we the have mystery man, someone with no
>>> significant legislative accomplishments to his name. He openly lies
>>> about the only executive experience he has because he doesn't want the
>>> public to know how he spent the millions or who he spent it with. He
>>> gets a pass for hanging with a radical, openly racist church, because
>>> he's black? I don't think his or anyone else's religion matters. It
>>> doesn't matter to me if you're Muslim, Buddhist, or Hindu, but if they
>>> routinely say at your mosque or temple, "God Damn America", "white
>>> man's greed starves a world in need", "the US government invented
>>> AIDS", "United States of KKK", I'm not voting for you. Just sitting
>>> through 20 years of that crap is enough, but then to say with a
>>> straight face, "I never heard those things"? Are people really that
>>> gullible or does that not matter?
>>>
>>> What strange times we're living in!
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:46 AM, TN Rhodey <tnrhodey at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Exactly who is this man that tingles so many legs?
>>>>
>>>> Brad, You know some people are pretty pissed about the last 8 years.
>>>> They
>>>> recognize who had control for 6 of those years. They see that McCain
>>>> has
>>>> been part of the problem for over 20 years. They see the deck was
>>>> stacked
>>>> for right success and they delivered failure. I think it is that
>>>> simple. I
>>>> am not saying this is right, wrong or indifferent,,,,, it is just the
>>>> way it
>>>> is. W
>>>>
>>>> I will (most likely) vote for Barr out of disgust knowing my vote
>>>> doesn't
>>>> matter. McCain doesn't need my vote in TN and it will not help Obama
>>>> win. If
>>>> your state isn't close the Electoral system can make one feel somewhat
>>>> disenfranchised. I was leaning towards mcCain but I must admit his
>>>> choice of
>>>> Palin bothered me. Yeah I know folks are crazy abour her. I wonder what
>>>> they
>>>> would think if she was ugly?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Brad Haslett <flybrad at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Wally,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not suggesting it isn't a significant endorsement, it is, but it
>>>>> was not unexpected. Powell has always been a moderate if not a
>>>>> liberal (he holds his political cards pretty close to his chest,
>>>>> always a good move for a General). He's been saying for months how
>>>>> much he admires Obama and how exciting it will be to have the first
>>>>> black President. When JC Watts says he has mixed emotions you know
>>>>> race is a huge emotional factor. Oh, but I forget, we're in the
>>>>> post-racial era.
>>>>>
>>>>> Getting back to the basics that should disturb everyone, we have
>>>>> massive voter fraud taking place nationwide by Acorn, an organization
>>>>> that Obama has very close ties to. We have massive amounts of money
>>>>> being raised that conveniently are below the $200 threshold for
>>>>> reporting and yet we already know that much of these funds are from
>>>>> foreign sources. We have a candidate with known ties to Marxists and
>>>>> unrepentant terrorists (the evidence is overwhelming) and few are
>>>>> curious. We have a candidate with gaping holes in his resume that no
>>>>> one seems interested in exploring.
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly who is this man that tingles so many legs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Brad
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:49 AM, TN Rhodey <tnrhodey at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Brad, I disagree. This is not your average meaningless "Joe
>>>>>> Hollywood"
>>>>>> endorsement. I admire Powell and respect his opinion and judgement. I
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> think
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> many others do as well. Unlike a Ted Kennedy endorsement (or Clinton)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> this
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> speaks to those outside the left base. I am not saying I am voting
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Obama
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> but I recognize the significance of this endorsement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fair Winds,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wally
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Brad Haslett <flybrad at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wally,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Powell endorsing Obama is a "dog bites man" story. He's been
>>>>>>> hinting
>>>>>>> for months that this was coming, and surprise, surprise, Obama has
>>>>>>> said Powell will have a position in an Obama administration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I did find interesting was Powell's pooh-poohing the Bill
>>>>>>> Ayer's
>>>>>>> connection. He obviously gets his news from the MSM as well,
>>>>>>> although
>>>>>>> late in the game, even the MSM is having second thoughts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's some more news that's being ignored. Obama and Ayers had
>>>>>>> offices in the same building at 115 South Sangamon St. in Chicago.
>>>>>>> "Just a guy in my neighborhood"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And now for a short film clip (10 min)-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cH7kT4xwddg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:12 AM, TN Rhodey <tnrhodey at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pete, Neither party speaks to me so I tend to doubt everything
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> both
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sides. That includes posts from list members. Brad and Ed made a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> claim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the media buried the story...I took the time to check and could
>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to support their viewpoint. Just because your read something in
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> "in-box' doesn't make it true! It is amazing how many folks believe
>>>>>>>> something off a blog/news without taking the time to check facts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Both sides claim media bias and they are right. The truth is out
>>>>>>>> there.....you just need to look.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey how about C. Powell endorsing Obama! I didn't know he was a
>>>>>>>> Marxist/socialist freedom hater!! ::-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fair winds,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wally
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 9:55 AM, petelargo <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> petelauritzen at earthlink.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey Wally, forget stuff like Factcheck. Brad has secret sources.
>>>>>>>>> He
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> knows
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> someone who knows someone who is a second cousin of Ed's who knows
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that has tons of irrefutable evidence so incendiary that even
>>>>>>>>> newsmax
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> foxnews won't touch it . That's how he knew Biden would be
>>>>>>>>> replaced
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> by
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hillary in one of his most recent 'I know best' political
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> revelations.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TN Rhodey-2 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tootle/Brad,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There may be a reason this story was "buried".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_it_recently_revealed_that_the_us.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know you guys like to send each other hundreds of emails
>>>>>>>>>> knocking
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> other side but you really need to check your facts. Brad must be
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> relying
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> the same source that told him the economy was strong!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You guys are too funny.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wally
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Brad Haslett
>>>>>>>>>> <flybrad at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ed,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The MSM buried the story. Attached is one archive. Most
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> newspapers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> posted it deep in their papers and hardly any broadcast news
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> outlets
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> touched the story. The US Armed Forces kept it quiet because it
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> stayed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> under heavy guard for years and they didn't want to draw
>>>>>>>>>>> attention
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> it until it was safely in Canada for processing.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Brad
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Posted on Sun, Jul. 6, 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Iraq's nuclear 'yellowcake' moved to Canada
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> By Brian Murphy
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Associated Press
>>>>>>>>>>> The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program - a
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> huge
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> stockpile of concentrated natural uranium - reached a Canadian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> port
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> yesterday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> two-week
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" - the seed
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> material
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> higher-grade nuclear enrichment - was a significant step toward
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> closing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> books on Hussein's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to
>>>>>>>>>>> U.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Iraqi
>>>>>>>>>>> authorities who had worried that the cache would reach
>>>>>>>>>>> insurgents
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> or
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What's now left is the final and complicated push to clean up
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> remaining radioactive debris at the former Tuwaitha nuclear
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> complex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 12
>>>>>>>>>>> miles south of Baghdad - using teams that include Iraqi experts
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> recently
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> trained in the Chernobyl fallout zone in Ukraine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Everyone is very happy to have this safely out of Iraq," said
>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> senior
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. official who outlined the nearly three-month operation to
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> Associated Press. The official spoke on condition of anonymity
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the sensitivity of the subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> While yellowcake alone is not considered potent enough for a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so-called
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "dirty bomb" - a conventional explosive that disperses
>>>>>>>>>>> radioactive
>>>>>>>>>>> material
>>>>>>>>>>> - it could stir widespread panic if incorporated into a blast.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yellowcake
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> also can be enriched for use in reactors and, at higher levels,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nuclear
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> weapons using sophisticated equipment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Iraqi government sold the yellowcake to a Canadian uranium
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> producer,
>>>>>>>>>>> Cameco Corp., in a transaction the official described as worth
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> "tens
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> millions of dollars." A Cameco spokesman, Lyle Krahn, declined
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> discuss
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the price, but said the yellowcake would be processed at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> facilities
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ontario for use in energy-producing reactors.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "We are pleased . . . that we have taken [the yellowcake] from
>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> volatile
>>>>>>>>>>> region into a stable area to produce clean electricity," he
>>>>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The deal culminated more than a year of intense diplomatic and
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> military
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> initiatives - kept hushed in fear of ambushes or attacks once
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> convoys
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> were under way: first carrying 3,500 barrels by road to Baghdad,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> then
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 37
>>>>>>>>>>> military flights to the Indian Ocean atoll of Diego Garcia, and
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> finally
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> aboard a U.S.-flagged ship for an 8,500-mile trip to Montreal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And, in a symbolic way, the mission linked the current attempts
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> stabilize Iraq with some of the high-profile claims about
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> Hussein's
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> weapons
>>>>>>>>>>> capabilities in the buildup to the 2003 invasion.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Accusations that Hussein had tried to purchase more yellowcake
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> from
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> African nation of Niger - and an article by a former U.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> ambassador
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> refuting the claims - led to a wide-ranging probe into
>>>>>>>>>>> Washington
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> leaks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> reached high into the Bush administration.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tuwaitha and an adjacent research facility were well-known for
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> decades
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> the centerpiece of Hussein's nuclear efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Later,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> had
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> War.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>>> was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> official
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Find this article at:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.philly.com/inquirer/world_us/20080706_Iraq_s_nuclear__yellowcake__moved_to_Canada.html?adString=inq.news/world_us;!category=world_us;&randomOrd=101508072055
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wally,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I could not find a reference for the yellow cake that came thru
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Charleston,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> SC. It was a discreet comment on local South Carolina radio.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> However, that ship apparently was not all. See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=50430
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just maybe the MSM (Main Stream Media) does not tell all?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Especially
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> which it does not want.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And just maybe the current political news is just as biased?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ed K
>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenville, SC, USA
>>>>>>>>>>>> attachment:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p19994370/statement.gifstatement.gif
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tootle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wally said, "I have seen many on this list proven wrong about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WMD".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> While many argue that many things were included in Weapons of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> Mass
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Destruction, some want the term limited to whether Iraq had a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nuclear
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> program. So limit the term to Iraq's nuclear programs under
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Saddam.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discreetly, over 200 metric tons of yellow cake were removed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> from
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Iraq
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought to US thru port of Charleston and shipped to unstated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> American
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> plant for processing. And was that same stuff that Clark said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Iraq
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was not interested in? How did Iraq acquire 200 metric tons
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> semi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> processed Uranium ore? Which asks the question what was it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> going
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> used for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ed K
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenville, SC, USA
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attachment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p19994121/Attention.jpgAttention.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p19994370/statement.gifstatement.gif
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Wally-said%2C-%22...--Political--tp19994121p19994370.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing
>>>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> go
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> go
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> go
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Wally-said%2C-%22...--Political--tp19994121p20056333.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list
>>>>>>>>> go
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list