[Rhodes22-list] Failure to state (speak) truth (Political Response to egregious misstatements)

[Rik Sandberg]

Brad, Ed,

Here's a little table from the WSJ that might illustrate Brad's point.

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-wallpol-sort.html

Rik

Will Rogers often said, "There's nothing quite like money in the bank." He went on to say, "I'm not so concerned about the return on my money as I am about the return of my money."



Brad Haslett wrote:
> Ed,
>
> 1.2 Trillion dollars.  1.2 Trillion!  That's how much value the market
> lost yesterday. It could have easily been up by half that amount or
> more.  One person, a so called House leader, couldn't even get her own
> committee chairman behind her, then she runs her foot wide pie-hole
> for five minutes and look at the results.  1.2 Trillion in one day.
>
> Follow the money.  Who do the people on Wall Street primarily donate
> money to?  Read the constitution. Who is responsible for making laws?
> Why does Wall Street overwhelmingly support one party over another?
>
> 1.2 Trillion
>
> Brad
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:
>   
>> It was posted on this forum, "The people are not willing to allow the nouveau
>> rich CEOs to keep their multimillion bail-out packages - the packages
>> designed to insulate them from the consequences of their decisions."
>>
>> It was implied that conservative Americans caused the above.  Analyze the
>> perpetrators of the alleged acts.   There were two principle categories.
>>
>> There were those employed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Were those
>> culprits conservatives or even employed by conservative thinking boards?
>> No, look at Raines and Johnson.  Raines was the favorite of the California
>> Marxist and National Democrat, Maxine Waters.  Johnson was a fellow traveler
>> of Barack Obama and even was on his Vice Presidential search committee!
>> What happens to their organizations under their watch?  The poster continues
>> to espouse lies.
>>
>> The second category is the business executives being employed by major
>> corporations.  These executives are employed by a board of directors.  Often
>> they are chairman of the board, i.e., the boss.  The board members are often
>> anointed by them.  That is insider abuse of position.  I am sure that many
>> lawsuits will follow.  Breach of fiduciary duty by those culprits will by
>> exposed.  Maybe appropriate legislation will be enacted demanding separation
>> of those positions in publically held companies.
>>
>> Those ethical abuses are not caused by conservatives.  They apparently are
>> tolerated by National Democrats and Rockefeller Republicans [aka NeoMarxist]
>> under all kinds of slick talk and dubious reasoning.  But how often does
>> that reasoning ask for good moral judgement?
>>
>> Socialism and Marxism are not a good answer.  Just look at the Marxist
>> influence on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Insiders appointed and anointed by
>> Marxist screwed Americans as fast as they could.
>>
>> The failure was lack or no oversight.  Conservatives do not oppose having a
>> Sheriff.  The Sheriff must not be controlled by fox nor must he enforce the
>> foxes agenda.  The poster of these remarks fails to properly analyze the
>> situation and spouts lies and misstatements as facts.  He sounds like Maxine
>> Waters and other Marxists.
>>
>> Failure of ethical conduct is thus well demonstrated under socialist
>> programs.  It will not be fixed by more socialist programs causing more
>> opportunity for more misconduct.
>>
>> Ed K
>> Greenville, SC, USA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failure-to-state-%28speak%29-truth-%28Political-Response-to-egregious-misstatements%29-tp19739721p19739721.html
>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>     
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>