[Rhodes22-list] Failure to state (speak) truth (Political Response to egregious misstatements)

[Tootle]

Rik,

Where are the numbers for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?  ACORN? And amounts
paid to all lobyist by those organizations?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Ed K
Greenville, SC, USA
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19741339/How%2Bto%2Bstart%2Ba%2Bpolitical%2Blie.jpg
How+to+start+a+political+lie.jpg 


Rik Sandberg-2 wrote:
> 
> Brad, Ed,
> 
> Here's a little table from the WSJ that might illustrate Brad's point.
> 
> http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-wallpol-sort.html
> 
> Rik
> 
> Will Rogers often said, "There's nothing quite like money in the bank." He
> went on to say, "I'm not so concerned about the return on my money as I am
> about the return of my money."
> 
> 
> 
> Brad Haslett wrote:
>> Ed,
>>
>> 1.2 Trillion dollars.  1.2 Trillion!  That's how much value the market
>> lost yesterday. It could have easily been up by half that amount or
>> more.  One person, a so called House leader, couldn't even get her own
>> committee chairman behind her, then she runs her foot wide pie-hole
>> for five minutes and look at the results.  1.2 Trillion in one day.
>>
>> Follow the money.  Who do the people on Wall Street primarily donate
>> money to?  Read the constitution. Who is responsible for making laws?
>> Why does Wall Street overwhelmingly support one party over another?
>>
>> 1.2 Trillion
>>
>> Brad
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:
>>   
>>> It was posted on this forum, "The people are not willing to allow the
>>> nouveau
>>> rich CEOs to keep their multimillion bail-out packages - the packages
>>> designed to insulate them from the consequences of their decisions."
>>>
>>> It was implied that conservative Americans caused the above.  Analyze
>>> the
>>> perpetrators of the alleged acts.   There were two principle categories.
>>>
>>> There were those employed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Were those
>>> culprits conservatives or even employed by conservative thinking boards?
>>> No, look at Raines and Johnson.  Raines was the favorite of the
>>> California
>>> Marxist and National Democrat, Maxine Waters.  Johnson was a fellow
>>> traveler
>>> of Barack Obama and even was on his Vice Presidential search committee!
>>> What happens to their organizations under their watch?  The poster
>>> continues
>>> to espouse lies.
>>>
>>> The second category is the business executives being employed by major
>>> corporations.  These executives are employed by a board of directors. 
>>> Often
>>> they are chairman of the board, i.e., the boss.  The board members are
>>> often
>>> anointed by them.  That is insider abuse of position.  I am sure that
>>> many
>>> lawsuits will follow.  Breach of fiduciary duty by those culprits will
>>> by
>>> exposed.  Maybe appropriate legislation will be enacted demanding
>>> separation
>>> of those positions in publically held companies.
>>>
>>> Those ethical abuses are not caused by conservatives.  They apparently
>>> are
>>> tolerated by National Democrats and Rockefeller Republicans [aka
>>> NeoMarxist]
>>> under all kinds of slick talk and dubious reasoning.  But how often does
>>> that reasoning ask for good moral judgement?
>>>
>>> Socialism and Marxism are not a good answer.  Just look at the Marxist
>>> influence on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Insiders appointed and
>>> anointed by
>>> Marxist screwed Americans as fast as they could.
>>>
>>> The failure was lack or no oversight.  Conservatives do not oppose
>>> having a
>>> Sheriff.  The Sheriff must not be controlled by fox nor must he enforce
>>> the
>>> foxes agenda.  The poster of these remarks fails to properly analyze the
>>> situation and spouts lies and misstatements as facts.  He sounds like
>>> Maxine
>>> Waters and other Marxists.
>>>
>>> Failure of ethical conduct is thus well demonstrated under socialist
>>> programs.  It will not be fixed by more socialist programs causing more
>>> opportunity for more misconduct.
>>>
>>> Ed K
>>> Greenville, SC, USA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Failure-to-state-%28speak%29-truth-%28Political-Response-to-egregious-misstatements%29-tp19739721p19739721.html
>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>     
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>   
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
> 
> 
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19741339/How%2Bto%2Bstart%2Ba%2Bpolitical%2Blie.jpg
How+to+start+a+political+lie.jpg 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failure-to-state-%28speak%29-truth-%28Political-Response-to-egregious-misstatements%29-tp19739721p19741339.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.