[Rhodes22-list] Failure to state (speak) truth (Political Response to egregious misstatements)

[Rik Sandberg]

Ed,

I don't know. WSJ wrote that, not me.

Rik

Will Rogers often said, "There's nothing quite like money in the bank." He went on to say, "I'm not so concerned about the return on my money as I am about the return of my money."



Tootle wrote:
> Rik,
>
> Where are the numbers for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?  ACORN? And amounts
> paid to all lobyist by those organizations?
>
> Inquiring minds want to know.
>
> Ed K
> Greenville, SC, USA
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p19741339/How%2Bto%2Bstart%2Ba%2Bpolitical%2Blie.jpg
> How+to+start+a+political+lie.jpg 
>
>
> Rik Sandberg-2 wrote:
>   
>> Brad, Ed,
>>
>> Here's a little table from the WSJ that might illustrate Brad's point.
>>
>> http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-wallpol-sort.html
>>
>> Rik
>>
>> Will Rogers often said, "There's nothing quite like money in the bank." He
>> went on to say, "I'm not so concerned about the return on my money as I am
>> about the return of my money."
>>
>>
>>
>> Brad Haslett wrote:
>>     
>>> Ed,
>>>
>>> 1.2 Trillion dollars.  1.2 Trillion!  That's how much value the market
>>> lost yesterday. It could have easily been up by half that amount or
>>> more.  One person, a so called House leader, couldn't even get her own
>>> committee chairman behind her, then she runs her foot wide pie-hole
>>> for five minutes and look at the results.  1.2 Trillion in one day.
>>>
>>> Follow the money.  Who do the people on Wall Street primarily donate
>>> money to?  Read the constitution. Who is responsible for making laws?
>>> Why does Wall Street overwhelmingly support one party over another?
>>>
>>> 1.2 Trillion
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> It was posted on this forum, "The people are not willing to allow the
>>>> nouveau
>>>> rich CEOs to keep their multimillion bail-out packages - the packages
>>>> designed to insulate them from the consequences of their decisions."
>>>>
>>>> It was implied that conservative Americans caused the above.  Analyze
>>>> the
>>>> perpetrators of the alleged acts.   There were two principle categories.
>>>>
>>>> There were those employed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Were those
>>>> culprits conservatives or even employed by conservative thinking boards?
>>>> No, look at Raines and Johnson.  Raines was the favorite of the
>>>> California
>>>> Marxist and National Democrat, Maxine Waters.  Johnson was a fellow
>>>> traveler
>>>> of Barack Obama and even was on his Vice Presidential search committee!
>>>> What happens to their organizations under their watch?  The poster
>>>> continues
>>>> to espouse lies.
>>>>
>>>> The second category is the business executives being employed by major
>>>> corporations.  These executives are employed by a board of directors. 
>>>> Often
>>>> they are chairman of the board, i.e., the boss.  The board members are
>>>> often
>>>> anointed by them.  That is insider abuse of position.  I am sure that
>>>> many
>>>> lawsuits will follow.  Breach of fiduciary duty by those culprits will
>>>> by
>>>> exposed.  Maybe appropriate legislation will be enacted demanding
>>>> separation
>>>> of those positions in publically held companies.
>>>>
>>>> Those ethical abuses are not caused by conservatives.  They apparently
>>>> are
>>>> tolerated by National Democrats and Rockefeller Republicans [aka
>>>> NeoMarxist]
>>>> under all kinds of slick talk and dubious reasoning.  But how often does
>>>> that reasoning ask for good moral judgement?
>>>>
>>>> Socialism and Marxism are not a good answer.  Just look at the Marxist
>>>> influence on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Insiders appointed and
>>>> anointed by
>>>> Marxist screwed Americans as fast as they could.
>>>>
>>>> The failure was lack or no oversight.  Conservatives do not oppose
>>>> having a
>>>> Sheriff.  The Sheriff must not be controlled by fox nor must he enforce
>>>> the
>>>> foxes agenda.  The poster of these remarks fails to properly analyze the
>>>> situation and spouts lies and misstatements as facts.  He sounds like
>>>> Maxine
>>>> Waters and other Marxists.
>>>>
>>>> Failure of ethical conduct is thus well demonstrated under socialist
>>>> programs.  It will not be fixed by more socialist programs causing more
>>>> opportunity for more misconduct.
>>>>
>>>> Ed K
>>>> Greenville, SC, USA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Failure-to-state-%28speak%29-truth-%28Political-Response-to-egregious-misstatements%29-tp19739721p19739721.html
>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>     
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p19741339/How%2Bto%2Bstart%2Ba%2Bpolitical%2Blie.jpg
> How+to+start+a+political+lie.jpg 
>