[Rhodes22-list] Failure to state (speak) truth (Political Response to egregious misstatements)

[Hank]

According to their table thats 7.8 million for Obama and 2.8 million for
McCain.  It's obvious to me that Wall St. wants the Dems in power.  I guess
they feel that the Dems are better for their business.  As they say, follow
the money and you'll find the root cause of the problem.

Hank


On 9/30/08, Rik Sandberg <sanderico1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Brad, Ed,
>
> Here's a little table from the WSJ that might illustrate Brad's point.
>
> http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-wallpol-sort.html
>
> Rik
>
> Will Rogers often said, "There's nothing quite like money in the bank." He
> went on to say, "I'm not so concerned about the return on my money as I am
> about the return of my money."
>
>
>
> Brad Haslett wrote:
> > Ed,
> >
> > 1.2 Trillion dollars.  1.2 Trillion!  That's how much value the market
> > lost yesterday. It could have easily been up by half that amount or
> > more.  One person, a so called House leader, couldn't even get her own
> > committee chairman behind her, then she runs her foot wide pie-hole
> > for five minutes and look at the results.  1.2 Trillion in one day.
> >
> > Follow the money.  Who do the people on Wall Street primarily donate
> > money to?  Read the constitution. Who is responsible for making laws?
> > Why does Wall Street overwhelmingly support one party over another?
> >
> > 1.2 Trillion
> >
> > Brad
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:
> >
> >> It was posted on this forum, "The people are not willing to allow the
> nouveau
> >> rich CEOs to keep their multimillion bail-out packages - the packages
> >> designed to insulate them from the consequences of their decisions."
> >>
> >> It was implied that conservative Americans caused the above.  Analyze
> the
> >> perpetrators of the alleged acts.   There were two principle categories.
> >>
> >> There were those employed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Were those
> >> culprits conservatives or even employed by conservative thinking boards?
> >> No, look at Raines and Johnson.  Raines was the favorite of the
> California
> >> Marxist and National Democrat, Maxine Waters.  Johnson was a fellow
> traveler
> >> of Barack Obama and even was on his Vice Presidential search committee!
> >> What happens to their organizations under their watch?  The poster
> continues
> >> to espouse lies.
> >>
> >> The second category is the business executives being employed by major
> >> corporations.  These executives are employed by a board of
> directors.  Often
> >> they are chairman of the board, i.e., the boss.  The board members are
> often
> >> anointed by them.  That is insider abuse of position.  I am sure that
> many
> >> lawsuits will follow.  Breach of fiduciary duty by those culprits will
> by
> >> exposed.  Maybe appropriate legislation will be enacted demanding
> separation
> >> of those positions in publically held companies.
> >>
> >> Those ethical abuses are not caused by conservatives.  They apparently
> are
> >> tolerated by National Democrats and Rockefeller Republicans [aka
> NeoMarxist]
> >> under all kinds of slick talk and dubious reasoning.  But how often does
> >> that reasoning ask for good moral judgement?
> >>
> >> Socialism and Marxism are not a good answer.  Just look at the Marxist
> >> influence on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Insiders appointed and
> anointed by
> >> Marxist screwed Americans as fast as they could.
> >>
> >> The failure was lack or no oversight.  Conservatives do not oppose
> having a
> >> Sheriff.  The Sheriff must not be controlled by fox nor must he enforce
> the
> >> foxes agenda.  The poster of these remarks fails to properly analyze the
> >> situation and spouts lies and misstatements as facts.  He sounds like
> Maxine
> >> Waters and other Marxists.
> >>
> >> Failure of ethical conduct is thus well demonstrated under socialist
> >> programs.  It will not be fixed by more socialist programs causing more
> >> opportunity for more misconduct.
> >>
> >> Ed K
> >> Greenville, SC, USA
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Failure-to-state-%28speak%29-truth-%28Political-Response-to-egregious-misstatements%29-tp19739721p19739721.html
> >> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>