[Rhodes22-list] Compression Repair and Addition of CompressionPost
Michael D. Weisner
mweisner at ebsmed.com
Fri Feb 6 08:40:00 EST 2009
David,
I keep looking at your photos for an explanation and I believe that the
cause of the failure may be documented in the photo labeled "shimpost.jpg"
from your website (see attached photo.) The more I think about it, the more
I am inclined to think that it is a failure of the deck structure. Your
boat has two hatches, one either side of the mast, with a small ribbon of
deck between them to support the mast. It appears to be no wider than about
a foot and the mast is offset about a foot towards the stern from the
support column. This transfers all of the mast load (static and dynamic) to
this small portion of deck material. I wonder if the load exceeded the
capability of the deck materials, without a plate to spread the load. Your
solution to add another column achieves a bridge effect, bolstering the
weakened ability of the deck to carry a substantial load.
The questions are: Was the boat manufactured this way? Were the hatches
factory installed? Was the mast always IMF? Did water intrusion into the
deck, possibly from a leak near the hatches, compromise the deck load
bearing ability? Was the mast overloaded due to collision with a fixed
object or overtensioning of the stays? Is the hardware attached to the mast
(furling genny or IMF) affixed improperly or damaged creating a repetitive
motion (excessive movement and noise while at anchor) able to drive the mast
(hammer) into the cabin top?
Mike
s/v Shanghaid'd Summer ('81)
Nissequogue River, NY
From: "David Culp" Friday, February 06, 2009 12:55 AM
> Mike:
> Yes, we made a through examination of everything we could and everything
> else appears normal The bulkhead which normally supports the cabin roof
> has
> not moved-what happened is that the cabin roof was bending downward behind
> the bulkhead and the roof liner was being crushed in by the rear edge of
> the
> bulkhead. Once we flexed the cabin top up back into its proper position,
> it
> was this crushed indention that had to be filled with the shims, otherwise
> the weight of the mast would only be borne by the cabin-top structure and
> the new post. I think we fixed it, but I would like to know what caused
> this in the first place.
>
> David
>
>
>
> From: "Michael D. Weisner" <mweisner at ebsmed.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Compression Repair and Addition of
> Compression Post
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <013367FE3C614147A443FDDE0AD33C7A at D9X7C761>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> David,
>
> Nice job! This appears to be a good solution to the problem that has
> plagued you since you bought the boat. I understand your statement "the
> hand tight shrouds match correspondingly in tension and length from the
> chain-plates for the first time since I've owned the boat. (The port
> shrouds
> were always a slight bit shorter)" These observations are usually a good
> clue to something being "not quite right" structurally.
>
> Did the yard check the structure below the floor? On these older boats,
> it
> has been common for the stringers to compress under load due to water
> damage
> in the forward area of the cabin bilge, permitting the cabin sole to sag,
> particularly if the boat was stored on the trailer with the bow lower than
> the stern permitting rainwater accumulation in this area.
>
> Mike
> s/v Shanghaid'd Summer ('81)
> Nissequogue River, NY
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: shimpost.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 280065 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20090206/b75724e9/attachment.jpg
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list