[Rhodes22-list] Sailing Upwind

Caesar Paul caesarpaul01 at yahoo.com
Thu Nov 4 14:30:00 EDT 2010


Ben,

I don't have them, but thanks for sharing that bit of info with us.

Caesar




________________________________
From: BenCittadino <bencittadino at gmail.com>
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Sent: Thu, November 4, 2010 11:12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Sailing Upwind


Rummy & Dave;

I remember being taught in the USN to NEVER sit upon, lean against, or even
touch the life line railings aboard ship. The only time anyone should touch
them is when maintaining or repairing them. The idea is they are only there
as a last resort and if you have to grab them you shouldn't be out there to
begin with.

I would never tell anyone not to have them because if they keep you from
going overboard only once in twenty years they can be worth the money, but
remember they are not built for routine daily stress and strain, or
reliance. You can look at them, but don't touch them 'till you really need
them.

BenC
s/v susan kay ('93 recycled '08) (no railings)

R22RumRunner wrote:
> 
> Dave,
> Unless you have small children, I see no need for the railings. Just my 2  
> cents worth. I like to keep things both simple and clean.
>  
> Rummy
>  
>  
> In a message dated 11/4/2010 1:01:42 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> rhodes22dave at gmail.com writes:
> 
> Rummy, I  think the railings are okay.  They make great hangers for the
> fenders  at the dock.  [?]
> I could do without them, but my wife likes  them.  They are handy to lean
> against a little, for balance, when  cleaning or doing various chores
> about
> the boat.
> When under sail,  actually they don't get in the way or interfere with the
> 175.  They  virtually touch the outer stays, and the sail could not go in
> further  anyway.
> The one inconvenience is that the genoa sheet can, in the process  of
> tacking, get wedged in between the stay and the rail, requiring me to  go
> forward and free it, or to jiggle the line and try to fool with it  
> remotely.
> However, I would be interested in the views of others that have  rails.  I
> was planning to order them on my new R22, but I could be  persuaded either
> way, if the Commandant--my wife--could be persuaded (an  unlikely event).
> Dave
> 
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:17 AM,  <R22RumRunner at aol.com> wrote:
> 
>> Dave,
>> The fact that  you have the side railings makes your boat a completely
>> different  animal. I have never sailed on one with the railings, but I
>> can
>>  imagine the problems you will encounter with them. You might ask for  
> advice
>> from
>> someone who has the railings. Personally, I don't  like them on a 22 foot
>> sailboat. In fact, I don't even like them on a  larger boat, but I
>> understand
>> why  they might be needed.  Your inability to make the 175 work for you
>> is
>> directly  related  to the railings. You might want to consider replacing
>> your
>>  furling drum  with one that allows a complete sail change on the  fly,
>> unlike
>> the GB  furler.
>>
>>  Rummy.......still waiting for the shuttle to go up.
>>
>>
>> In  a message dated 11/3/2010 12:55:35 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>  rhodes22dave at gmail.com writes:
>>
>> Lee,  thanks for your  comments.  I may give you a call, as I will have  
> to
>> decide  which sail to put on my R22 this time, as compared to the 175 I
>>  have
>> been using.  Last weekend the wind was mild but  steady--about 5  mph.
>>  Using
>> the full 175 was very  pleasant.  But in gusty or  changeable winds (our
>>  most
>> common lake condition), and where sailing close  hauled is  important,
>> the
>> 175
>> is simply too much sail area too far  forward,  and even when largely
>> furled,
>> the boat doesn't  point well--worse than all  the other boats that I see.
>> Unless  the genoa is furled way in, I don't see  how I could lead the  
> sheets
>> through the inner guides on the deck, inside  the  shrouds.  I was 
> surprised
>> that you mentioned that the  smaller  genoa would be closer to the deck.  
> I
>> haven't seen  one, but I assumed  that the 130/140/150 sizes would simply 
> be
>>  made in their smaller sizes by  shortening or raising the foot of the  
> sail.
>>
>> I also use my full 175 less  than 20% of the time,  and when I am on a 
> reach
>> in mild weather conditions,  it is a  very nice sail.  So if you can keep 
> a
>> decent sail shape and  still furl it way in for other conditions and
>> re-route
>> the  sheets to one of  the inner paths, then it's probably a good
>>  multi-purpose compromise for a  sail.  80% of the time, I have the 
>> genoa
>> furled in to greater or  lesser degrees, and I am telling  myself that 
> next
>> time I am going to have a  smaller  sail.
>>
>> I also have the steel side rails, which are very  convenient, but the
>> sheets
>> do often catch between the rails  and the stays  on tacking, and I have
>> to
>> go
>> forward and  free them up.  This is  avoided by furling in substantially
>>  just
>> before tacking, and then letting  the sail back out, but a  smaller sail
>> would
>> be just that much more  convenient.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:33  PM, KUHN, LELAND  <LKUHN at cnmc.org> wrote:
>>
>> >  Dave,
>> >
>> > "I have  never
>> > liked the 175  genoa very much because I can't sail nearly as  close to
>> >  the
>> > wind as any of hundreds of other sailboats on our  lake."
>> >
>> > I don't think a smaller Genoa will help you  sail closer  to the wind
>> as
>> > much as re-routing your  sheets.  You still won't  be able to pull your
>> > jib or  smaller Genoa closer to the center of your  boat if your sheets
>>  > are run outside of the outer  shroud.
>> >
>> > As  for sail shape, you can pull a 175% Genoa just as  tight as a  
> smaller
>> > Genoa.  A smaller Genoa won't have as much  rolled-up bulk around the
>> > furler and the sail will be closer to  the  deck, which will probably
>> > improve performance slightly  if you're on a  close reach.
>> >
>> > The primary reason  I would opt for a smaller  Genoa is because I use 
> the
>> > full  175% sail less than 20% of the  time.  When I do use the full 
> 175%  I
>> > swear I'll never go with  anything smaller.
>>  >
>> > Feel free to give me a call if you'd like to  discuss  upwind 
> performance.
>> > 202.476.5369
>> >
>> >  Good  luck!
>> >
>> > Lee
>> > 1986  Rhodes22  AT EASE
>> > Kent  Island, MD
>> >
>>  >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> >  From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
>> >  [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Rhodes22Dave
>>  >  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 11:51 PM
>> > To:  rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list]  Sailing  Upwind
>> >
>> >
>> > Interesting. I  will try this.  I also  thought that re-routing the 
> genoa
>>  > sheets inside the shrouds would just  get the sail caught.  I  have 
> never
>> > liked the 175 genoa very much  because I can't  sail nearly as close to
>> > the
>> > wind as any of  hundreds of other sailboats on our lake.  I can do a
>> >  little
>> > better by furling in the genoa to a much smaller exposed  sail  
> area--but
>> > at a
>> > cost of sail shape with  all the furling.  I may get a second R22 and 
> am
>> >  thinking of getting a smaller genoa--or  adding the self-tending  jib.
>> > But
>> > what you suggest might be a  solution,  at least for long tacks.
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > Ben  Cittadino  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I had two days in a  row on Sandy Hook Bay in  NJ this weekend, and I
>> >  want
>> > > to report that I had a  pleasing experience by  "finally" re-routing 
> the
>> > > Jib (175 Genny)  sheets inside  the outer shrouds to try for better
>> > upwind
>> >  >  sailing. I have to say that I didn't expect much difference, but I  
> was
>> >  > delighted to get inside 45 degrees at last. I  obviously didn't let
>>  the
>> > > Genny out to the full  175, but at 100 we flew along and I  felt like 
> I
>> > > could  make real headway upwind. I had delayed trying  the new route 
> for
>>  > > the sheets because I thought the sail would get  all hung up in  the
>> > > shrouds, but it's become no big deal. Try it,  you'll like it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>  > >  BenCittadino
>> > >
>> > > S/V Susan Kay  ('93 recycled  '08)
>> > >
>> > >
>> >  >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >  >
>> >  >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >  >
>> >  >
>> > >  __________________________________________________
>> >  >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>>  > View this message in  context:
>>http://old.nabble.com/Sailing-Upwind-tp29517214p30044777.html
>> >  Sent  from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>  >
>> >  __________________________________________________
>> > To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>> >
>>  > For the  list Charter and help with using the mailing list and  
> archives
>> > go to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>  >  __________________________________________________
>>  >
>> >  __________________________________________________
>> > To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>> >
>>  > For the  list Charter and help with using the mailing list and  
> archives
>> go
>> > to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>  >  __________________________________________________
>>  >
>> __________________________________________________
>>  To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>
>> For the  list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives  
> go
>> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>  __________________________________________________
>>
>>  __________________________________________________
>> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>
>> For the  list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
>> go
>> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>  __________________________________________________
>>
> --------------  next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not  available
> Type: image/png
> Size: 646 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url  :  
>http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20101104/2d5d8591/attachment.png 
>  
>
> __________________________________________________
> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to  
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> 
> For the list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go 
> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
> 
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> 
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Sailing-Upwind-tp29517214p30134738.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__________________________________________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe go to 
http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list

For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go to 
http://www.rhodes22.org/list
__________________________________________________


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list