[Rhodes22-list] Steve 2 cycle vs 4 cycle smoke: ad nauseam

Steve rhodes2282 at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 13 07:48:33 EST 2004


One thing that I would add.  When you go to buy a new
motor; pop off the cover and ask yourself - What would
I do if it stop working far from shore?  Make you
think!!!  FYI- Has everyone seen these Big Bass Boats
with those big 4 stroke motor - Have you notice they
all are carrying nowadays a 9.9 or 25 hp 2 stroke
Kicker:-)  Wonder why???????????????
Steve





--- Steve <rhodes2282 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jim
> It manufactors make the 2 stroke meet standards; how
> can you say they will become a thing of the past?  I
> don't know anyone that like a 4 stroke who has
> brought
> one.  Their heavy and most folks can work on them
> themselfs.  When you are out on the water & your
> motor
> goes out; being able to work on it yourself is more
> important than polluting the air and/or water. 
> Besides, it is a well know fact that boat motors are
> not the big factor that pollute water.  That like
> saying that smoking is the #1 health problem of
> people.  Everyone know that being FAT is the #1
> health
> problem.  2 stroke will not be done away with except
> on small bodies of water (that if the facts were
> known
> are poluted by things other that oil)  & Calaforia
> (where all the crazy enviromentists live).  The
> reasons most manufactors push 4 strokes are that
> they
> get all the repair business.  Why fall into that
> game.
>  If you want to throw away your money; give it to
> me;
> I'll make good use of it and buy some Bourbon:-)
> Steve
> 
> 
> --- Jim White <jdwhite at panam.edu> wrote:
> > 
> >    The 2 stroke 4 stroke debate is one that no
> only
> > in sailors circles,
> >    but motorboat circles and generates spirited
> and
> > lively debate- it's
> >    akin to arguing religion or politics. As a
> former
> > mechanic turned
> >    biologist (marine), I work hand in hand with
> > outboards, and repair
> >    shops at our facility each day. We probably log
> > more water time than
> >    the average individual (I would guess). Here
> are
> > some of the things
> >    that I have become aware of over the past
> several
> > years:
> >    1. Two stroke engines will very well soon be a
> > thing of the past.
> >    Pressure at the federal level to reduce
> emissions
> > in the water, as
> >    well as the air will cause the death of the
> > 2-stroke. Common sense
> >    then tells us that it will become increasingly
> > difficult to obtain
> >    parts for those out of manufacture engines. Yes
> > all engines pollute,
> >    and modern two strokes pollute much less than
> > older ones. There are
> >    real fears out there like folks who mix their
> oil
> > in the field (i.e.
> >    in the parking lot or out on the water, and
> spill
> > directly, or older 2
> >    strokes that mix into the gas tank by human
> > addition of the oil,
> >    running around rich and smokey ("smoke
> > pots").....these are all well
> >    founded fears that the regulators & and
> > environmentalists (especially)
> >    justify in pushing out the good ol' 2 stroke
> >    2. Four stroke engines  are inherently heavier
> > than two strokes to a
> >    certain point in horsepower rating (about 90 or
> > so), at which time the
> >    weight becomes a non-issue. This makes a great
> > deal of difference to
> >    the small engine/small boat owner, especially
> > ones like
> >    us....Manufacturers are working on cutting the
> > weight of those smaller
> >    engines though, and the gap is closing there.
> >    3. Two stroke engines by virtue of operation
> have
> > a higher low end
> >    torque which can be useful if you're powering a
> > boat that needs to
> >    "get out of the hole" quickly....usually
> doesn't
> > apply to sailcraft.
> >    However newer 4 strokes are quickly closing
> that
> > gap also.
> >    4. According to our shops, four stroke engines
> > have fewer problems,
> >    and see far less down time and many of our
> former
> > two stroke engine
> >    fishing guides, eco-tour operators, and
> > especially sailboat owners are
> >    now turning to the 4 stroke with this fact as a
> > major selling point.
> >    However, when a four stroke breaks, it can be a
> > more costly repair
> >    than a comparable two stroke, but again, with
> > design changes in both
> >    engines, the gap narrows here too.....
> >    In any event, our facility has now plunged into
> > the 4 stroke world
> >    along with the tide of others. BTW I have a
> 2002
> > 9.9 Honda 4stroke as
> >    auxiliary (notice the previous word) power for
> my
> > newly acquired
> >    Rhodes 22, Le Menagerie.
> >    Cheers (and sorry for the lengthy
> > diatribe/dissertation...
> >    JDWHITE
> >    At 05:57 AM 02/13/2004 -0800, you wrote:
> > 
> >      Wally
> >      I can't remember where I read the article
> about
> > 2
> >      strokes meeting standards; one of my sail mag
> >      probably.  But I would think you are right. 
> If
> > the
> >      smaller motors don't already; its just a
> matter
> > of
> >      time.
> >      Steve
> >      --- Wally Buck <tnrhodey at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >      > I had heard that the new cleaner 2 strokes
> > were only
> >      > coming out in the
> >      > larger motors. Is this true? I got to think
> > that the
> >      > technolgy will trickly
> >      > down to the smaller motors as well but you
> > never
> >      > know.....
> >      >
> >      > Wally
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > >From: "Kroposki" <kroposki at innova.net>
> >      > >Reply-To: kroposki at innova.net,The Rhodes
> 22
> > mail
> >      > list
> >      > ><rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >      > >To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'"
> >      > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >      > >Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Steve 2 cycle vs
> 4
> > cycle
> >      > smoke
> >      > >Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:42:21 -0500
> >      > >
> >      > >Steve,
> >      > >     The issue is that new 2 cycle engines
> > are not
> >      > smoke pots.  They
> >      > >more than comply with the current
> > environmental
> >      > standards and they will
> >      > >comply with the new impending standards.
> >      > >     As for using oil, all gas motors use
> > oil and some
> >      > of that
> >      > >lubricating oil is combusted.  The issue
> is
> > how
> >      > much of that oil and gas
> >      > >is wasted directly into the environment. 
> > The old 2
> >      > cycle engines did
> >      > >not care.  However, the EPA standards got
> > the
> >      > manufacturers attention
> >      > >and the new engines do not statistically
> > pollute
> >      > the environment more
> >      > >than 4 cycle engines which also spew
> > pollutants.
> >      > All gas engines
> >      > >pollute.  It is a matter of degree.  When
> > that
> >      > degree is evaluated
> >      > >statistically is the difference
> significant?
> >      > Simply put, will the
> >      > >impact difference between the two types of
> > motors
> >      > on the environment
> >      > >really matter?  A few years ago the answer
> > was yes,
> >      > however, with design
> >      > >changes the effects are no longer
> > statistically
> >      > significant.  They both
> >      > >pollute.
> >      > >
> >      > >                                       Ed
> K
> >      > >-----Original Message-----
> >      > >From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >      >
> > >[[1]mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On
> >      > Behalf Of Steve
> >      > >Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:01 AM
> >      > >To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> >      > >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] 2 cycle vs 4
> > cycle
> >      > >
> >      > >I thought the reason they came out with 4
> > strocks
> >      > were
> >      > >to satify the Non-smoking folks:-) You
> know,
> > you
> >      > have
> >      > >a smoking part of a Restaurant; and a
> > non-smoking
> >      > >part.  You can now have a smoking part of
> a
> > lake; &
> >      > a
> >      > >non-smoking part:-)You see, the more folks
> > that go
> >      > 4
> >      > >stoke; that means the more folks that can
> go
> > 2
> >      > stoke.
> >      > >And the enviroment only get poluted the
> same
> > amount
> >      > >that we have always done for
> years:-)Beside,
> > we
> >      > need a
> >      > >little more Globle warming.  Temps here
> are
> > in the
> >      > >40s.  That evendent that we need to polute
> > quite a
> >      > bit
> >      > >more.  Arkansas need to be warm up so are
> > winter
> >      > stay
> >      > >above 50 degrees:-)What are you thinking,
> >      > Michael:-)
> >      > >Steve
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >--- Michael Meltzer
> <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com>
> > wrote:
> >      > > > Well lets try a differ tack for the
> > sessions
> >      > version
> >      > > > of the question, "So how much harm are
> > you
> >      > willing
> >      > > > to cause, like: frogs
> >      > > > killed, fish unfit to eat, woman
> > miscarry,
> >      > children
> >      > > > born with birth defects, men going
> > impememnt,
> >      > etc..
> >      > > > so you can selflessy use
> >      > > > your 2 stoke". BTW did you beat your
> wife
> > to day
> >      > :-)
> >      > > >
> >      > > > MJM
> >      > > >
> >      > > >
> >      > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >      > > > From: "Kroposki" <kroposki at innova.net>
> >      > > > To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'"
> >      > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >      > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 9:12
> > AM
> >      > > > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] 2 cycle vs 4
> > cycle
> >      > > >
> >      > > >
> >      > > > > Rummy,
> >      > > > > Here we go again.  I know better than
> > question
> >      > the
> >      > > > technical
> >      > > > > accuracy and efficacy of Roger's
> > eloquent
> >      > > > discussion, but I can lift my
> >      > > > > 2 cycle when I have to by myself. 
> > Roger
> >      > forgets
> >      > > > that not everybody has
> >      > > > > two robust sons to help.  It is the
> old
> >      > problem of
> >      > > > being able to see a
> >      > > > > tree when you are in a forest.
> >      > > > > Ed K
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >      > > > > From:
> > rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >      > > > >
> > [[2]mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On
> >      > > > Behalf Of Roger Pihlaja
> >      > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004
> 7:52
> > AM
> >      > > > > To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> >      > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Yamaha
> 9.9
> > Water
> >      > Pump
> >      > > > Replacement
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > > Jay,
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > > The usual problem with the water pump
> >      > impellors on
> >      > > > small outboards is
> >      > > > > that
> >      > > > > they are made from some sort of
> rubber.
> >  It's
> >      > > > really a rather clever
> >      > > > > design.
> >      > > > > At low speed & at start-up, the
> rubber
> > vanes
> >      > on
> >      > > > the impellor touch the
> >      > > > > water
> >      > > > > pump housing, thus making the pump
> > positive
> >      > > > displacement & self-priming.
> >      > > > > At
> >      > > > > high speed, the rubber vanes deflect
> > out of
> >      > the
> >      > > > way & ride on top of a
> >      > > > > boundary layer of water on the wetted
> > surface
> >      > of
> >      > > > the water pump housing.
> >      > > > > At
> >      > > > > high speed, the vanes don't
> experience
> > any
> >      > wear
> >      > > > because they are not
> >      > > > > touching the pump housing.  This
> design
> > makes
> >      > the
> >      > > > water pump capable of
> >      > > > > automatically switching from positive
> >      > displacement
> >      > > > mode to centrifugal
> >      > > > > mode
> >      > > > > for delivering the high volume of
> > cooling
> >      > water
> >      > > > required by high speed
> >      > > > > operation.
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > > So what goes wrong?  Well, if the
> water
> > pump
> >      > ever
> >      > > > runs dry, the rubber
> >      > > > > impellor will lose the lubrication &
> > cooling
> >      > > > provided by the water,
> >      > > > > overheat, & destroy itself very
> > quickly, like
> >      > in a
> >      > > > few seconds!
> >      > > > > Exposure to
> >      > > > > oil & gasoline in the water (like the
> > oil film
> >      > > > that laid down by 2-cycle
> >      > > > > outboards) will gradually break down
> > the
> >      > rubber
> >      > > > polymer molecules in the
> >      > > > > impellor; leading to embrittlement,
> > cracking,
> >      > and
> >      > > > failure.  This is
> >      > > > > probably
> >      > > > > the single biggest long-term failure
> >      > mechanism.
> >      > > > Pump impellors should
> >      > > > > be
> >      > > > > routinely replaced every 4 years due
> to
> > this
> >      > cause
> >      > > > alone.  There is also
> >      > > > > another common failure mechanism
> > related to
> >      > > > storage.  When the lower leg
> >      > > > > is
> >      > > > > lifted free of the water, the entire
> > cooling
> >      > > > system drains down.  This
> >      > > > > is
> >      > > > > why the water pump needs to be
> > self-priming at
> >      > > > start-up.  Even fresh
> >      > > > > water &
> >      > > > > especially ocean water, has a certain
> > amount
> >      > of
> >      > > > dissolved mineral salts
> >      > > > > in
> >      > > > > it.  When the cooling system drains
> > down, a
> >      > small
> >      > > > amount of water is
> >      > > > > left
> >      > > > > trapped in between the ends of the
> > vanes on
> >      > the
> >      > > > water pump impellor &
> >      > > > > the
> >      > > > > aluminum pump housing.  When this
> water
> >      > eventually
> >      > > > evaporates in
> >      > > > > storage,
> >      > > > > the impellor vanes can be bonded by
> > salt
> >      > crystals
> >      > > > to the pump housing.
> >      > > > > Depending upon how strong this bond
> is,
> > the
> >      > rubber
> >      > > > impellor can be
> >      > > > > damaged
> >      > > > > the next time the engine is started
> > when the
> >      > vanes
> >      > > > are ripped free of
> >      > > > > the
> >      > > > > salt crystals.  In addition, for the
> > 1st few
> >      > > > minutes of operation,
> >      > > > > before
> >      > > > > the salt crystals dissolve, they form
> a
> >      > relatively
> >      > > > rough surface on the
> >      > > > > water pump housing that the rubber
> > vanes have
> >      > to
> >      > > > run over on every
> >      > > > > revolution.  Finally, there can be
> > corrosion
> >      > > > issues with moist salt
> >      > > > > crystals
> >      > > > > in long-term contact with the
> aluminum
> > pump
> >      > > > housing in this scenario.
> >      > > > > In
> >      > > > > salt water, it's considered good
> > practice to
> >      > fresh
> >      > > > water flush the
> >      > > > > cooling
> >      > > > > system after every use & certainly
> > before
> >      > > > long-term storage.  After
> >      > > > > long-term storage, it wouldn't hurt
> to
> > fresh
> >      > water
> >      > > > flush the cooling
> >      > > > > system
> >      > > > > prior to start-up.  As part of my
> > outboard
> >      > > > winterizing proceedure, I
> >      > > > > flush
> >      > > > > propylene gylcol potable antifreeze
> (RV
> > "red
> >      > pop")
> >      > > > thru the cooling
> >      > > > > systems
> >      > > > > of my outboards.  propylene glycol
> will
> >      > prevent
> >      > > > the build-up of salt
> >      > > > > crystals in-between the vanes and the
> > water
> >      > pump
> >      > > > housing.  During the
> >      > > > > boating season, on every start-up, I
> > gently
> >      > pull
> >      > > > the outboard thru with
> >      > > > > the
> >      > > > > pull cord prior to starting it to
> break
> > the
> >      > water
> >      > > > pump impellor free &
> >      > > > > give
> >      > > > > the engine several minutes of low
> speed
> >      > warm-up.
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > > The result, the only water pump I've
> > ever had
> >      > fail
> >      > > > on any of my
> >      > > > > outboards in
> >      > > > > 25+ years of boating was the time
> when
> > my
> >      > younger
> >      > > > son Gary ran the
> >      > > > > inflatable dingy & Honda 9.9 hp
> > outboard up on
> >      > the
> >      > > > beach with the engine
> >      > > > > at
> >      > > > > full throttle.  The water pump
> impellor
> > was
> >      > burnt
> >      > > > to a crisp!
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > > Good luck!
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > > Roger Pihlaja
> >      > > > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> >      > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >      > > > > From: "Michael Meltzer"
> >      > <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com>
> >      > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> >      > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >      > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004
> 2:25
> > AM
> >      > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Yamaha
> 9.9
> > Water
> >      > Pump
> >      > > > Replacement
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > > > sounds like overkill and make work,
> > maybe
> >      > the
> >      > > > impeller very 4 years,
> >      > > > > but
> >      > > > > the complete pump, nah. you are only
> > putting
> >      > 25-50
> >      > > > hours on
> >      > > > > > the motor every year, one thing you
> > do have
> >      > to
> >      > > > watch is salt on the
> >      > > > > thermostat(and blow the pelages,
> clean
> > the pee
> >      > tub
> >      > > > yearly), is
> >      > > > > > one of the few parts on the engine
> > that is
> >      > not
> >      > > > rust proof, time will
> >      > > > > get
> >      > > > > it and they need to be replace every
> > two
> >      > years,
> >      > > > luckily it
> >      > > > > > is also a simple job that you can
> do
> >      > yourself.
> >      > > > > >
> >      > > > > > MJM
> >      > > > > >
> >      > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >      > > > > > From: "Jay Friedland"
> > <a.jayf at verizon.net>
> >      > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> >      > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >      > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004
> > 11:25 AM
> >      > > > > > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Yamaha 9.9
> > Water
> >      > Pump
> >      > > > Replacement
> >      > > > > >
> >      > > > > >
> >      > > > > > > Folks,
> >      > > > > > > My ob service guy says Yam
> > recommends
> >      > > > replacing the water pump
> >      > > > > assembly
> >      > > > > > > every year. The motor is 2001
> with
> > this
> >      > the
> >      > > > first year in service.
> >      > > > > I'm
> >      > > > > > > in salt water 9-10 months,
> > occasionally
> >      > flush
> >      > > > with ear muffs (once a
> >      > > > > > > month), and end of season run it
> in
> > a
> >      > barrel
> >      > > > of fresh water for 1/2
> >      > > > > > > hour (alos to burn off deposits,
> > etc.).
> >      > > > > > >
> >      > > > > > > Anybody offer best suggestions on
> >      > proceeding
> >      > > > with this replacement
> >      > > > > or
> >      > > > > > > any other winter routine?
> >      > > > > > >   Thanks, Jay
> >      > > > > > >
> >      > > > > > >
> >      > > >
> >      >
> > __________________________________________________
> >      > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org,
> > Help?
> >      > > > [3]www.rhodes22.org/list
> >      > > > > > >
> >      > > > > > >
> >      > > > > >
> >      > > > > >
> >      > > >
> >      >
> > __________________________________________________
> >      > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org,
> Help?
> >      > > > [4]www.rhodes22.org/list
> >      > > > > >
> >      > > > > >
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > >
> >      >
> > __________________________________________________
> >      > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >      > > > [5]www.rhodes22.org/list
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > >
> >      >
> > __________________________________________________
> >      > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >      > > > [6]www.rhodes22.org/list
> >      > > > >
> >      > > > >
> >      > > >
> >      > > >
> >      >
> > __________________________________________________
> >      > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >      > >[7]www.rhodes22.org/list
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >__________________________________
> >      > >Do you Yahoo!?
> >      > >Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by
> > filing
> >      > online.
> >      > >[8]http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
> >      >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >      > >Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >      > [9]www.rhodes22.org/list
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >      > >Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >      > [10]www.rhodes22.org/list
> >      >
> >      >
> >     
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
> >      > Keep up with high-tech trends here at
> "Hook'd
> > on
> >      > Technology."
> >      >
> > [11]http://special.msn.com/msnbc/hookedontech.armx
> >      >
> >      >
> > __________________________________________________
> >      > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >      [12]www.rhodes22.org/list
> >      __________________________________
> >      Do you Yahoo!?
> >      Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by
> filing
> > online.
> >      [13]http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
> >     
> > __________________________________________________
> >      Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > [14]www.rhodes22.org/list
> > 
> > References
> > 
> >    1. mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >    2. mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >    3. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >    4. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >    5. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >    6. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >    7. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >    8. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
> >    9. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >   10. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >   11.
> http://special.msn.com/msnbc/hookedontech.armx
> >   12. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >   13. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
> >   14. http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing
> online.
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
www.rhodes22.org/list


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list