[Rhodes22-list] Problem shrouds = location of answer for David

Bill Effros bill at effros.com
Sat Jun 24 16:10:34 EDT 2006


Oh, please...

This is like a discussion of how hard to slam a car door.  You only have 
to slam it hard enough to close.  The car can take a harder slam, but 
you are not accomplishing anything good for the car by slamming the door 
harder.

We should banish Loos gauges from this list.  They are supposed to be 
calibrated for the type and size of stay they are measuring.  They don't 
measure in pounds--you interpolate index numbers.

Where the hell did 200 pounds come from, anyhow?

Is that 200 pounds when the other 8 shrouds are slack, or 200 pounds 
when the other 8 shrouds also each show 200 pounds?  Or is it 200 pounds 
total, divided by 9 shrouds?

The tension on the back stay which holds up the traveler is supposed to 
be the same as the tension on the lower side stays?

If the mast is not perpendicular to the boat, but all the stays register 
200 pounds--is the rigging ok?

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

Bill Effros

 

TN Rhodey wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Without a gauge it is hard to quantify hand tight. Perhaps someone 
> should tighten hand tight and then measure? What if three people 
> tightned hand tight and measured? I bet you would have 3 different 
> measurements. I must admit that mine are tighter than hand 
> tight....not much. Lee side shrouds still go slack. Sloppy or over 
> tight, either way creates proplems.
>
> Roger knew how tune an R22 and he used a gauge. Did you see his specs? 
> Anyone with IMF actually use a gauge? Someone should know this? I may 
> have to borrow a friend's gauge and measure .....
>
> Wally
>
>
>> From: Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net>
>> Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
>> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Problem shrouds = location of answer for David
>> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 07:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
>>
>>
>> David:
>>      I would like to suppliment Captain Rummy's response to you with 
>> where
>> you find documentation supporting what he is telling you.  Stan, aka,
>> General Boats, makes an instruction manual for the Rhodes 22.  With 
>> Rose's
>> permission, a copy of which is located in the Document Library of 
>> this web
>> site. See:
>>
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/doclib/Rhodes22-1988-Owners-Raven.pdf
>>
>>       Now specifically go to pages 4 and 5, especially about the guy who
>> used pliers to tighten the shrouds.  So after reading the instructions
>> promulgated by Stan you may begin to understand why most of use just 
>> follow
>> his instuctions.  Please understand that while Stan's education is
>> electrical engineering he is a nautical engineer by advocation.  The 
>> point
>> Rummy made is that the mast is not made to be over tighened.  What Rummy
>> said is supported by the instructional manual for this boat.
>>       Who ever told you to use 200 pounds of tension told you very 
>> wrong.
>> That kind of number may be correct for a fifty foot keel stepped racing
>> sailboat, but not appropriate for a cabin (deck) stepped mast without a
>> compression post from base to keel.   It sounds like somebody has 
>> created a
>> problem in over tensioning the stays.  Hopefully the cabin is not 
>> reshaped
>> permenantly.
>>        Many Cat boats and other modern designs do not even use stays 
>> to keep
>> the mast upright.  Read about the latest model Hunter sail boats.
>>
>> Ed K
>> Greenville, SC, USA
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-shrouds.-t1840793.html#a5025664
>> Sent from the Rhodes22 forum at Nabble.com.
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list