[Rhodes22-list] Foam for outside cushions
CarolN8 at aol.com
CarolN8 at aol.com
Mon Nov 10 17:03:27 EST 2008
I need to replace the cockpit cushions and Stan said I needed to make sure I
used closed cell foam. So does anyone know where to find closed cell foam in
my local area? Is there a certain type of store that carries it?
Carol
In a message dated 11/10/2008 10:01:03 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
rhodes22-list-request at rhodes22.org writes:
Send Rhodes22-list mailing list submissions to
rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rhodes22-list-request at rhodes22.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
rhodes22-list-owner at rhodes22.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Rhodes22-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: for Brad's eyes and those who reason only ... (Herb Parsons)
2. Re: for Brad's eyes and those who reason only ... (Herb Parsons)
3. Re: for Brad's eyes and those who reason only ... (John Shulick)
4. Re: for Brad's eyes and those who reason only ... (John Shulick)
5. Re: for Brad's eyes and those who reason only ...
(Michael D. Weisner)
6. Re: my last word on the election (ben)
7. question about electricity (Just bent)
8. St Petersburg boat show. For stan (Ron Singerman)
9. Re: question about electricity (R22RumRunner at aol.com)
10. question about shocking Rhodes 22's (Tootle)
11. Sailboats with water in desert... (Tootle)
12. Re: question about shocking Rhodes 22's (R22RumRunner at aol.com)
13. When you are dealing with Democrats, think of this ... (Tootle)
14. Re: When you are dealing with Democrats, think of this ...
(R22RumRunner at aol.com)
15. Re: When you are dealing with Democrats, think of this ...
(John Shulick)
16. (Humor) Banister of Life... (R22RumRunner at aol.com)
17. Re: question about shocking Rhodes 22's (John Shulick)
18. Re: question about electricity (Michael D. Weisner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:53:28 -0600
From: Herb Parsons <hparsons at parsonsys.com>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] for Brad's eyes and those who reason only
...
To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Message-ID: <49184AE8.4070307 at parsonsys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Thanks John, there are lots of us around.
Then there are folks who want to deride people because of their beliefs,
political views etc. You took a polite discussion about eminent domain
and turned it an accusation against Brad and I about "final solutions".
Maybe you and Slim SHOULD get together. You seem to have many
similarities, and he's looking for someone to do weird stuff to his ass.
John Shulick wrote:
> Steven,
>
> As a fellow alum from Duquesne Univ. I thank you for your support. Over the
> last 30 or so years I was a church soloist and section leader for just
about
> every major faith and I've seen many Herbs and some spices as well.(sorry
> couldn't resist)
>
> John Shulick
>
>
>
> Steven Alm wrote:
>
>> Herb,
>>
>> Do you have any idea how much you sound like you're talking out your ass?
>> Do you really want to put up your 1099 to show off what you've donated to
>> charity? You're such a bore. I'm going to guess that maybe you tithe a
>> full 10% to your fundamentalist church because they tell you to--out of
>> false compassion. And the money goes to your church--not anything real.
>> Or
>> at best a small percentage. I know you donate your time riding your
>> motorcycle around for stuff but is that actually giving? You're a
>> cheerleader. Great.
>>
>> As for the Native Americans you don't seem to have a grasp on history.
>> Just
>> because the Injuns didn't have a concept of land ownership or fences
>> doesn't
>> mean the white man didn't take it away from them. You're an idiot. The
>> Indians were living in the stone-age and were decimated by the white man
>> out
>> of greed and arrogance. There was no need for that. To say that they
>> simply met a stronger enemy completely usurps all that compassion and
>> charity that you espouse. You're full of shit! I was born on the
>> Sissiton
>> reservation in South Dakota and you can kiss my ass!
>>
>> Slim
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:36 PM, John Shulick <jsbudda at verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "John,"
>>> (at least you are capable of starting a post properly by addressing me by
>>> name. I assumed you were ignorant at first but now I see you're simply
>>> rude.
>>>
>>> "Go screw yourself."
>>> (Sorry to old to bend that way anymore perhaps you could send a pic of
>>> how
>>> you accomplish it yourself.)
>>>
>>> "I've never offered anything like a ""final solution"".
>>> You're reference reveals you for what you are."
>>>
>>> (you have no clue as to who or what I am)
>>>
>>> As far as me "detesting" anyone, you again speak from total ignorance.
>>> I'll make a deal with you though, I'll make my tax returns for the last
>>> 10 years public on here to show how much I've given to charity if you'll
>>> do the same.
>>>
>>> (Do you recall the parable of the pharisee and the old woman who went to
>>> the
>>> temple to make sacrifice?)
>>>
>>> You ready to put up? I doubt it. I suspect the size of your mouth is
>>> exceeded mainly by your ego, and your actions are far lacking compared
>>> to either.
>>>
>>> (In the mouth and ego department its no contest you win)
>>>
>>> If the government determines a need for social charity programs, they
>>> should do so by purchasing land they need. Simple. If it's too
>>> expensive, buy elsewhere.
>>>
>>> (that's what is happening in this instance so what's your problem)
>>>
>>> As to your notion about "stealing it from the original owners", which
>>> land are you talking about? You'll have to be a little more specific.
>>> Some of the Indian tribes didn't ascribe to the notion of "owning land".
>>> Others regularly took land from each other by armed conflict. So, the
>>> "theft" was actually their normally accepted means of transfer, they
>>> simply were defeated by a stronger enemy.
>>>
>>> (like white men with guns and smallpox infested blankets? do the words
>>> "trail of tears" mean anything to you?)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>>
http://www.nabble.com/for-Brad%27s-eyes-and-those-who-reason-only-...-tp20405744p20414236.html
>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:57:28 -0600
From: Herb Parsons <hparsons at parsonsys.com>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] for Brad's eyes and those who reason only
...
To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Message-ID: <49184BD8.3000201 at parsonsys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sorry John, let's just say that your word for it wouldn't be good enough
for me, you do keep records, right? If we're just going to say what the
percentage is, we can say.
Not interested in your social security. That's not giving, that's the
government taking.
As to your Wiki entry, thanks for confirming what I was trying to say.
It's good to see you are actually capable of learning. 1830 was a tad
later than the founding father's period.
John Shulick wrote:
>
> "I've got a heck of a deal for you. I'll buy your boat from you
> at the price that I determine is fair, and you can chose to accept it or
> .... oh wait, that would be your only choice.
>
> You do understand the implementation of eminent domain, right?"
>
> If you came for my boat I would sink it. If you came for my house I would
> burn it. If you came for my land I would render it unusable. You could have
> it after you have have hauled my dead body off it.
>
> "The only thing you can do to a free man is kill him." Robert A. Heinlein
>
> "You need to study history a little closer. The trail of tears happened
> LONG after the founding fathers did their thing, you can't blame that
> one on them."
>
> Excerpt from the Wikipedia
>
> The Trail of Tears was the forced relocation of Native Americans from
their
> homelands to Indian Territory (present day Oklahoma) in the Western United
> States. The phrase originated from a description of the removal of the
> Choctaw Nation in 1831. Many Native Americans suffered from exposure,
> disease, and starvation while en route to their destinations, and many
died,
> including, for example, 4,000 of the 15,000 relocated Cherokee. Thousands
of
> enslaved and free African-Americans (as slaves accompanying their Native
> American slaveowners and as former runaway slaves that were assisted by,
> assimilated by, or married to members of the tribes) accompanied the
removed
> nations on the Trail of Tears.
> In 1830, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee (Creek), and Seminole
> (sometimes collectively referred to as the Five Civilized Tribes) were
> living as autonomous nations in what would be called the American Deep
> South. The process of cultural transformation (proposed by GEORGE
WASHINGTON
> and HENERY KNOX) was gaining momentum, especially among the Cherokee and
> Choctaw. Indian removal was first proposed by THOMAS JEFFERSON. Andrew
> Jackson was the first U.S. President to implement removal with the passage
> of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. In 1831 the Choctaw were the first to be
> removed, and they became the model for all other removals. After the
> Choctaw, the Seminole were removed in 1832, the Creek in 1834, then the
> Chickasaw in 1837, and finally the Cherokee in 1838.
>
> "I'll make my tax returns for the last
> 10 years public on here to show how much I've given to charity if you'll
> do the same."
>
> To many pages to post, HOWEVER I'm Prepared to release my annual social
> security statement showing what I've earned in my lifetime and will write
in
> how many jobs I had to work to make it along with what I gave to
> charity.(Care to dance?)
>
> John Shulick
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:38:07 -0800 (PST)
From: John Shulick <jsbudda at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] for Brad's eyes and those who reason only
...
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <20422255.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
hparsons wrote:
>
> "Thanks John, there are lots of us around."
>
> That's why this country is in such trouble
>
> "Then there are folks who want to deride people because of their beliefs,
> political views etc. You took a polite discussion about eminent domain
> and turned it an accusation against Brad and I about "final solutions"."
>
> Oh please listen to the pot calling the kettle black. If you don't want
> comment about your conversations then don't post them in a public forum
> such as this. Use the back channel or private e-mails to amuse yourselves
> with your conservative nonsense, please leave the rest of us out of it.
>
> "Maybe you and Slim SHOULD get together. You seem to have many
> similarities, and he's looking for someone to do weird stuff to his ass."
>
> I would consider performing with Steven if he were so inclined and the
> time presented itself. the only ass I'm concerned with is the one I'm
> responding to right now.
>
>
> John Shulick wrote:
>> Steven,
>>
>> As a fellow alum from Duquesne Univ. I thank you for your support. Over
>> the
>> last 30 or so years I was a church soloist and section leader for just
>> about
>> every major faith and I've seen many Herbs and some spices as well.(sorry
>> couldn't resist)
>>
>> John Shulick
>>
>>
>>
>> Steven Alm wrote:
>>
>>> Herb,
>>>
>>> Do you have any idea how much you sound like you're talking out your
>>> ass?
>>> Do you really want to put up your 1099 to show off what you've donated
>>> to
>>> charity? You're such a bore. I'm going to guess that maybe you tithe
>>> a
>>> full 10% to your fundamentalist church because they tell you to--out of
>>> false compassion. And the money goes to your church--not anything real.
>>> Or
>>> at best a small percentage. I know you donate your time riding your
>>> motorcycle around for stuff but is that actually giving? You're a
>>> cheerleader. Great.
>>>
>>> As for the Native Americans you don't seem to have a grasp on history.
>>> Just
>>> because the Injuns didn't have a concept of land ownership or fences
>>> doesn't
>>> mean the white man didn't take it away from them. You're an idiot. The
>>> Indians were living in the stone-age and were decimated by the white man
>>> out
>>> of greed and arrogance. There was no need for that. To say that they
>>> simply met a stronger enemy completely usurps all that compassion and
>>> charity that you espouse. You're full of shit! I was born on the
>>> Sissiton
>>> reservation in South Dakota and you can kiss my ass!
>>>
>>> Slim
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:36 PM, John Shulick <jsbudda at verizon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "John,"
>>>> (at least you are capable of starting a post properly by addressing me
>>>> by
>>>> name. I assumed you were ignorant at first but now I see you're simply
>>>> rude.
>>>>
>>>> "Go screw yourself."
>>>> (Sorry to old to bend that way anymore perhaps you could send a pic of
>>>> how
>>>> you accomplish it yourself.)
>>>>
>>>> "I've never offered anything like a ""final solution"".
>>>> You're reference reveals you for what you are."
>>>>
>>>> (you have no clue as to who or what I am)
>>>>
>>>> As far as me "detesting" anyone, you again speak from total ignorance.
>>>> I'll make a deal with you though, I'll make my tax returns for the last
>>>> 10 years public on here to show how much I've given to charity if
>>>> you'll
>>>> do the same.
>>>>
>>>> (Do you recall the parable of the pharisee and the old woman who went
>>>> to
>>>> the
>>>> temple to make sacrifice?)
>>>>
>>>> You ready to put up? I doubt it. I suspect the size of your mouth is
>>>> exceeded mainly by your ego, and your actions are far lacking compared
>>>> to either.
>>>>
>>>> (In the mouth and ego department its no contest you win)
>>>>
>>>> If the government determines a need for social charity programs, they
>>>> should do so by purchasing land they need. Simple. If it's too
>>>> expensive, buy elsewhere.
>>>>
>>>> (that's what is happening in this instance so what's your problem)
>>>>
>>>> As to your notion about "stealing it from the original owners", which
>>>> land are you talking about? You'll have to be a little more specific.
>>>> Some of the Indian tribes didn't ascribe to the notion of "owning
>>>> land".
>>>> Others regularly took land from each other by armed conflict. So, the
>>>> "theft" was actually their normally accepted means of transfer, they
>>>> simply were defeated by a stronger enemy.
>>>>
>>>> (like white men with guns and smallpox infested blankets? do the words
>>>> "trail of tears" mean anything to you?)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
http://www.nabble.com/for-Brad%27s-eyes-and-those-who-reason-only-...-tp20405744p20414236.html
>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/for-Brad%27s-eyes-and-those-who-reason-only-...-tp20405744p20422255.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:45:50 -0800 (PST)
From: John Shulick <jsbudda at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] for Brad's eyes and those who reason only
...
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <20422391.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
hparsons wrote:
>
> Sorry John, let's just say that your word for it wouldn't be good enough
> for me, you do keep records, right? If we're just going to say what the
> percentage is, we can say.
>
> Didn't think you had the stones to back up your BS
>
> "Not interested in your social security. That's not giving, that's the
> government taking."
>
> Not interested in ever seeing me collect social security would be more
> accurate
>
> "As to your Wiki entry, thanks for confirming what I was trying to say.
> It's good to see you are actually capable of learning. 1830 was a tad
> later than the founding father's period."
>
> Obviously you have trouble comprehending what you read.
>
>
> John Shulick wrote:
>>
>> "I've got a heck of a deal for you. I'll buy your boat from you
>> at the price that I determine is fair, and you can chose to accept it or
>> .... oh wait, that would be your only choice.
>>
>> You do understand the implementation of eminent domain, right?"
>>
>> If you came for my boat I would sink it. If you came for my house I would
>> burn it. If you came for my land I would render it unusable. You could
>> have
>> it after you have have hauled my dead body off it.
>>
>> "The only thing you can do to a free man is kill him." Robert A. Heinlein
>>
>> "You need to study history a little closer. The trail of tears happened
>> LONG after the founding fathers did their thing, you can't blame that
>> one on them."
>>
>> Excerpt from the Wikipedia
>>
>> The Trail of Tears was the forced relocation of Native Americans from
>> their
>> homelands to Indian Territory (present day Oklahoma) in the Western
>> United
>> States. The phrase originated from a description of the removal of the
>> Choctaw Nation in 1831. Many Native Americans suffered from exposure,
>> disease, and starvation while en route to their destinations, and many
>> died,
>> including, for example, 4,000 of the 15,000 relocated Cherokee. Thousands
>> of
>> enslaved and free African-Americans (as slaves accompanying their Native
>> American slaveowners and as former runaway slaves that were assisted by,
>> assimilated by, or married to members of the tribes) accompanied the
>> removed
>> nations on the Trail of Tears.
>> In 1830, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee (Creek), and Seminole
>> (sometimes collectively referred to as the Five Civilized Tribes) were
>> living as autonomous nations in what would be called the American Deep
>> South. The process of cultural transformation (proposed by GEORGE
>> WASHINGTON
>> and HENERY KNOX) was gaining momentum, especially among the Cherokee and
>> Choctaw. Indian removal was first proposed by THOMAS JEFFERSON. Andrew
>> Jackson was the first U.S. President to implement removal with the
>> passage
>> of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. In 1831 the Choctaw were the first to
>> be
>> removed, and they became the model for all other removals. After the
>> Choctaw, the Seminole were removed in 1832, the Creek in 1834, then the
>> Chickasaw in 1837, and finally the Cherokee in 1838.
>>
>> "I'll make my tax returns for the last
>> 10 years public on here to show how much I've given to charity if you'll
>> do the same."
>>
>> To many pages to post, HOWEVER I'm Prepared to release my annual social
>> security statement showing what I've earned in my lifetime and will write
>> in
>> how many jobs I had to work to make it along with what I gave to
>> charity.(Care to dance?)
>>
>> John Shulick
>>
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/for-Brad%27s-eyes-and-those-who-reason-only-...-tp20405744p20422391.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:46:42 -0500
From: "Michael D. Weisner" <mweisner at ebsmed.com>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] for Brad's eyes and those who reason only
...
To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Message-ID: <3CD9CB18A9874C7D9ADEC1084154C3DB at ebsoffice>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Herb,
What are you trying to say? This is an attempt to phonetically spell a
foreign word, the name that they were known as, not just a name that was
applied to a location.
You guessed wrong.
Mike
s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
Nissequogue River, NY
From: "Herb Parsons" <hparsons at parsonsys.com> Sent: Monday, November 10,
2008 9:50 AM
> I'd say the indians didn't name the reservation, so my guess would be
> that the English spelling works.
>
>
> Michael D. Weisner wrote:
>> Herb,
>>
>> How is it that an English language spelling of a non-English word can be
>> said to be spelled incorrectly?
>>
>> A simple review of documents pertaining to the "Sissiton" through Google
>> revealed the following treaty with the Sioux (original scan of printed
>> text)
>> regarding the "Sissiton Bands" in which both spellings are used on the
>> same
>> page of the document:
>> http://digital.library.okstate.edu/Kappler/vol2/pgimages/sio0956.jpg
>>
>> Inconsistencies in translations of foreign words into common language
>> seem
>> to occur fairly often. When in China, just try to order Beijing Duck.
>>
>> Mike
>> s/v Shanghaid'd Summer ('81)
>> Nissequogue River, NY
>>
>> From: "Herb Parsons" <hparsons at parsonsys.com> Sent: Monday, November 10,
>> 2008 8:36 AM
>>
>>> C'mon now, if a guy wants to get bent out of shape over being born on a
>>> reservation and his treatment of the "Injuns" by "the white man", then
>>> can't spell the tribe's name, I say an exception is certainly in order.
>>>
>>> R22RumRunner at aol.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Herb,
>>>> At one time we had a list member named Steve who had a problem with
>>>> spelling
>>>> and grammar. At that time it was determined that spelling and
>>>> grammatical
>>>> errors were not fair game. It simply would have been to easy.
>>>>
>>>> Rummy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In a message dated 11/10/2008 1:27:02 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>>>> hparsons at parsonsys.com writes:
>>>>
>>>> My my Slim, little overboard there, aren't you?
>>>>
>>>> Nah, I don't REALLY want to put my 1099 up. I figured John would bow
>>>> out. He did.
>>>> You missed the percentage, by a considerable amount.
>>>> I don't belong to a fundamentalist church.
>>>> The church I belong to doesn't really tell me to do much of anything.
>>>> I've been there a while, they know that telling me what to do doesn't
>>>> work well
>>>> Probably about 1/2 of what we give to charity goes to our local
>>>> church.
>>>> There are several other entities that we give to as well.
>>>> Cheerleader? Wow. Because I ride with a group of guys that pay their
>>>> respects at funerals? And you call ME "a bore".
>>>>
>>>> I think if you'll reread my post, I never said anything similar to
>>>> "the
>>>> white man didn't take it away from them". As a matter of fact, I think
>>>> I
>>>> said just the opposite. They were defeated by a stronger enemy. Look a
>>>> little closer to home for the idiot.
>>>>
>>>> I don't care to kiss your ass, not really into that, but feel free to
>>>> invite what guys you can find that are. And, I don't care where you
>>>> were
>>>> born, you're still an idiot. If you were born on the Sisseton
>>>> reservation in SD, I'd figure you'd at least know the tribe was
>>>> Sisseton
>>>> not Sissiton.
>>>>
>>>> And, I never said anything about fences, but some tribes most
>>>> definitely
>>>> had concepts of "land ownership". They defended their hunting grounds
>>>> against other tribes as fiercely as the white man defended their
>>>> fences.
>>>> Two cultures clashed, the more advanced of the two prevailed.
>>>>
>>>> But, it's a moot point. I was talking about the founding fathers, not
>>>> the "white man" in general. The founding fathers were not involved in
>>>> breaking treaties, decimation of tribes, or the spreading of smallpox.
>>>> South Dakota was the still the mostly unexplored frontier, and I don't
>>>> think they (the founding fathers) had much exposure to the Sisseton
>>>> tribe.
>>>>
>>>> And none of that has anything to do with John's stupid statement about
>>>> a
>>>> "final solution".
>>>>
>>>> I don't have much in the way of charity or compassion for folks that
>>>> are
>>>> long since gone. Not much I can do for them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Steven Alm wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Herb,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have any idea how much you sound like you're talking out your
>>>>> ass?
>>>>> Do you really want to put up your 1099 to show off what you've
>>>>> donated
>>>>> to
>>>>> charity? You're such a bore. I'm going to guess that maybe you
>>>>> tithe
>>>>> a
>>>>> full 10% to your fundamentalist church because they tell you to--out
>>>>> of
>>>>> false compassion. And the money goes to your church--not anything
>>>>> real.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Or
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> at best a small percentage. I know you donate your time riding your
>>>>> motorcycle around for stuff but is that actually giving? You're a
>>>>> cheerleader. Great.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the Native Americans you don't seem to have a grasp on
>>>>> history.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Just
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> because the Injuns didn't have a concept of land ownership or fences
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> doesn't
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> mean the white man didn't take it away from them. You're an idiot.
>>>>> The
>>>>> Indians were living in the stone-age and were decimated by the white
>>>>> man
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> out
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> of greed and arrogance. There was no need for that. To say that
>>>>> they
>>>>> simply met a stronger enemy completely usurps all that compassion and
>>>>> charity that you espouse. You're full of shit! I was born on the
>>>>> Sissiton
>>>>> reservation in South Dakota and you can kiss my ass!
>>>>>
>>>>> Slim
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:36 PM, John Shulick <jsbudda at verizon.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "John,"
>>>>>> (at least you are capable of starting a post properly by addressing
>>>>>> me
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> name. I assumed you were ignorant at first but now I see you're
>>>>>> simply
>>>>>> rude.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Go screw yourself."
>>>>>> (Sorry to old to bend that way anymore perhaps you could send a pic
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> how
>>>>>> you accomplish it yourself.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I've never offered anything like a ""final solution"".
>>>>>> You're reference reveals you for what you are."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (you have no clue as to who or what I am)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as me "detesting" anyone, you again speak from total
>>>>>> ignorance.
>>>>>> I'll make a deal with you though, I'll make my tax returns for the
>>>>>> last
>>>>>> 10 years public on here to show how much I've given to charity if
>>>>>> you'll
>>>>>> do the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Do you recall the parable of the pharisee and the old woman who
>>>>>> went
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> temple to make sacrifice?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You ready to put up? I doubt it. I suspect the size of your mouth is
>>>>>> exceeded mainly by your ego, and your actions are far lacking
>>>>>> compared
>>>>>> to either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (In the mouth and ego department its no contest you win)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the government determines a need for social charity programs,
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> should do so by purchasing land they need. Simple. If it's too
>>>>>> expensive, buy elsewhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (that's what is happening in this instance so what's your problem)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As to your notion about "stealing it from the original owners",
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> land are you talking about? You'll have to be a little more
>>>>>> specific.
>>>>>> Some of the Indian tribes didn't ascribe to the notion of "owning
>>>>>> land".
>>>>>> Others regularly took land from each other by armed conflict. So,
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> "theft" was actually their normally accepted means of transfer, they
>>>>>> simply were defeated by a stronger enemy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (like white men with guns and smallpox infested blankets? do the
>>>>>> words
>>>>>> "trail of tears" mean anything to you?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> http://www.nabble.c
om/for-Brad%27s-eyes-and-those-who-reason-only-...-tp20405744p20414236.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all
>>>> other
>>>> Holiday needs. Search Now.
>>>>
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
>>>> -aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:46:51 -0600
From: "ben" <benonvelvetelvis at theskinnyonbenny.com>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] my last word on the election
To: "'The Rhodes 22 Email List'" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Message-ID: <000601c9434b$8e17c360$aa474a20$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
That was very close
Haiku is a fine art form
The first line needs work
-----Original Message-----
From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
[mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of stan
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 9:53
To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] my last word on the election
We Americans have not changed
we still rely on black folk
to clean up our mess
ss
__________________________________________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
http://www.rhodes22.org/list
__________________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:56:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Just bent <j.bulfer at jbtek.com>
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] question about electricity
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <20422568.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Went sailing yesterday in somewhat stormy weather. Had a great day. When we
got back to the dock, when you touch the boat, you would get shocked. I
unhooked the battery & still got shocked. Was it static electricity from the
storm?
Jb
Jb http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01925.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01927.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01930.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01931.jpeg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-electricity-tp20422568p20422568.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:13:26 -0500
From: "Ron Singerman" <sail at tds.net>
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] St Petersburg boat show. For stan
To: "Rhodes list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Message-ID: <D1D6AAF915EB4FEE9B55C76F6D2FFE4C at computer>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
stan,
Will you be represented at the St Pete show?
Fair winds and following seas,
>>ron<<
S/V Serenity
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:15:03 EST
From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] question about electricity
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <cb9.3c17dc54.3649b807 at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
JB,
Yes, what you experienced is static electricity. It wasn't caused by the
storms, but it is a natural phenomenon that has been discussed previously on
this forum many years ago. Your boat is basically a "plastic" boat. You have
plastic sails and metal thrown in for good measure. The sails are the most
likely culprit and the fiberglass and the rest of the boat are the storage
battery. The shock is even more noticeable when bare skin is involved, like
a bare
belly hanging over a rail. That will really get your attention, even when
drunk.
Rummy
In a message dated 11/10/2008 10:57:29 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
j.bulfer at jbtek.com writes:
Went sailing yesterday in somewhat stormy weather. Had a great day. When we
got back to the dock, when you touch the boat, you would get shocked. I
unhooked the battery & still got shocked. Was it static electricity from
the
storm?
Jb
Jb http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01925.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01927.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01930.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01931.jpeg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-electricity-tp20422568p20422568.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__________________________________________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
http://www.rhodes22.org/list
__________________________________________________
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all
other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http:
//searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:20:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net>
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] question about shocking Rhodes 22's
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <20423031.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Jay:
You are not the first to experience this! Several years ago, Carol Nixon of
Colorado had that very problem. She does not usually respond to this list
although she is still shown in the digested listing.
You might want to contact her to find out what she did. We referred to her
as lady with shocking Rhodes 22.
I posted pictures of her and her boat last spring.
Ed K
Just bent wrote:
>
> Went sailing yesterday in somewhat stormy weather. Had a great day. When
> we got back to the dock, when you touch the boat, you would get shocked. I
> unhooked the battery & still got shocked. Was it static electricity from
> the storm?
> Jb
>
> Jb http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01925.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01927.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01930.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01931.jpeg
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-electricity-tp20422568p20423031.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:22:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net>
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Sailboats with water in desert...
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <20423082.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Imagine, sailboats with water in the desert. Maybe that is where all Rummy's
water is?
Nice pictures.
Ed K
quote author="Just bent">
Went sailing yesterday in somewhat stormy weather. Had a great day. When we
got back to the dock, when you touch the boat, you would get shocked. I
unhooked the battery & still got shocked. Was it static electricity from the
storm?
Jb
Jb http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01925.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01927.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01930.jpeg
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01931.jpeg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-electricity-tp20422568p20423082.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:25:00 EST
From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] question about shocking Rhodes 22's
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <d4e.3e7b8fe7.3649ba5c at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Jay,
The last time we discussed this, I actually took a volt meter and measured
22 volts. I took the measurement from the offending rail and grounded the
negative end to the outboard which was in the water. The meter went to 22/23
volts and then almost instantly disappeared. Waiting a few minutes produced
the
same results. Since our boats are all 12 volt systems with 110 volt thrown
in
occasionally, it ruled out any source within the boat. The amperage was
really
low, so it was more of a nuisance shock than anything dangerous.
Rummy
In a message dated 11/10/2008 11:20:30 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
ekroposki at charter.net writes:
Jay:
You are not the first to experience this! Several years ago, Carol Nixon of
Colorado had that very problem. She does not usually respond to this list
although she is still shown in the digested listing.
You might want to contact her to find out what she did. We referred to her
as lady with shocking Rhodes 22.
I posted pictures of her and her boat last spring.
Ed K
Just bent wrote:
>
> Went sailing yesterday in somewhat stormy weather. Had a great day. When
> we got back to the dock, when you touch the boat, you would get shocked. I
> unhooked the battery & still got shocked. Was it static electricity from
> the storm?
> Jb
>
> Jb http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01925.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01927.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01930.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01931.jpeg
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/question-about-electricity-tp20422568p20423031.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__________________________________________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
http://www.rhodes22.org/list
__________________________________________________
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all
other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http:
//searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:25:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net>
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] When you are dealing with Democrats, think
of this ...
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <20423136.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Brad,
When you are dealing with Democrats, think of this:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/09/2008-11-09_councilman_vows
_to_quit_alcohol_after_pu.html
Ed K
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-you-are-d
ealing-with-Democrats%2C-think-of-this-...-tp20423136p20423136.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:30:42 EST
From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] When you are dealing with Democrats,
think of this ...
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <c61.3c981885.3649bbb2 at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Ed,
Must have been all republicans beneath him. Sure was a waste of a good
drink
though. :)
Rummy
In a message dated 11/10/2008 11:26:28 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
ekroposki at charter.net writes:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/09/2008-11-09_councilman_vows
_to_quit_alcohol_after_pu.html
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all
other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http:
//searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:46:21 -0800 (PST)
From: John Shulick <jsbudda at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] When you are dealing with Democrats,
think of this ...
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <20423560.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Ed,
Amusing. And you thought democrats don't believe in "Trickle Down Economics"
John Shulick
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/09/2008-11-09_councilman_vows
_to_quit_alcohol_after_pu.html
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/When-you-are-dealing-with-Democrats%2C-think-of-this-...-tp20423136p20423560.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:56:20 EST
From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] (Humor) Banister of Life...
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <ca8.39793310.3649c1b4 at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
As You Slide Down the Banister of Life, Remember:
1. Jim Baker and Jimmy Swaggert have written an impressive new book. It's
called ......... 'Ministers Do More Than Lay People.'
2. Transvestite: A guy who likes to eat, drink and be Mary.
3. The difference between the Pope and your boss, the Pope only expects you
to kiss his ring.
4. My mind works like lightning, One brilliant flash and it is gone.
5. The only time the world beats a path to your door is if you're in the
bathroom.
6. I hate sex in the movies. Tried it once. The seat folded up, the drink
spilled and that ice, well, it really chilled the mood.
7. It used to be only death and taxes were inevitable Now, of course,
there's shipping and handling, too.
8. A husband is someone who, after taking the trash out, gives the
impression that he just cleaned the whole house.
9. My next house will have no kitchen - just vending machines and a large
trash can.
10. A blonde said, 'I was worried that my mechanic might try to rip me off.
I was relieved when he told me all I needed was turn signal fluid.'
11. My neighbor was bit by a stray rabid dog. I went to see how he was and
found him writing frantically on a piece of paper.
I told him rabies could be treated, and he didn't have to worry about a
Will.
He said, 'Will? What Will? I'm making a list of the people I want to bite.'
12. Definition of a teenager? God's punishment... for enjoying sex.
13. As you slide down the banister of life, may the splinters never point
the wrong way.
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all
other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http:
//searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:57:03 -0800 (PST)
From: John Shulick <jsbudda at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] question about shocking Rhodes 22's
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Message-ID: <20423781.post at talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Rummy,
Was there a consensus reached about electrical grounding on a sailboat? I've
given the matter some thought and could make an argument either way but
would appreciate any input from more experienced people such as yourself.
Thank you
John Shulick
R22RumRunner wrote:
>
> Jay,
> The last time we discussed this, I actually took a volt meter and measured
> 22 volts. I took the measurement from the offending rail and grounded the
> negative end to the outboard which was in the water. The meter went to
> 22/23
> volts and then almost instantly disappeared. Waiting a few minutes
> produced the
> same results. Since our boats are all 12 volt systems with 110 volt thrown
> in
> occasionally, it ruled out any source within the boat. The amperage was
> really
> low, so it was more of a nuisance shock than anything dangerous.
>
> Rummy
>
>
> In a message dated 11/10/2008 11:20:30 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> ekroposki at charter.net writes:
>
>
> Jay:
>
> You are not the first to experience this! Several years ago, Carol Nixon
> of
> Colorado had that very problem. She does not usually respond to this
> list
> although she is still shown in the digested listing.
>
> You might want to contact her to find out what she did. We referred to
> her
> as lady with shocking Rhodes 22.
>
> I posted pictures of her and her boat last spring.
>
> Ed K
>
>
>
> Just bent wrote:
>>
>> Went sailing yesterday in somewhat stormy weather. Had a great day. When
>> we got back to the dock, when you touch the boat, you would get shocked.
>> I
>> unhooked the battery & still got shocked. Was it static electricity from
>> the storm?
>> Jb
>>
>> Jb http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01925.jpeg
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01927.jpeg
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01930.jpeg
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01931.jpeg
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/question-about-electricity-tp20422568p20423031.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
> **************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all
> other
> Holiday needs. Search Now.
>
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
> -aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-question-about-shocking-Rhodes-22%27s-tp20423177p20423781.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:58:09 -0500
From: "Michael D. Weisner" <mweisner at ebsmed.com>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] question about electricity
To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Message-ID: <B61F6996D13A4BA09C617101740CF42D at ebsoffice>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Jb,
The first pic is just fabulous! For an northeast boater, the
foothills/mountains show that it is not like any water that we sail in here
on the LI Sound. Beautiful - and the water still feels wet and you can sail
on the stuff? Here, boats are hauled and wrapped, the leaves have nearly
all fallen (we did have one of the prettiest autumns in years) ... Now if
only we could sail on snow!
As far as static electricity accumulating on the hull goes, it is probably
due to the lack of humidity. Just as it occurs on airplanes, the winds
redistribute electrons, causing a charge to build up on the insulated
(fiberglass) hull. The simplest way to remedy this is to provide a leakage
path to the water. All conductive metal objects (motor housing, rails,
mast, rigging, etc.) should be connected together via a small wire (no real
current is involved) and terminated at a fixture that is exposed to the
water. Care should be taken to make connection to the water away from
gasoline vapors (not at the motor or mount) and using a "sacrificial anode",
something that you would not miss, as it may be consumed by galvanic
corrosion in the process of transferring the charge. See
http://www.boatus.com/boattech/casey/23.htm
The creation of static electricity in this manner has been a real problem in
biking (bicycles) due to the use of nylon suits and composite helmets. Some
people have had good results using antistatic preparations such as fabric
softeners to solve the problem. While treating the hull with wax increases
the static generation ability, applying fabric softener solutions may reduce
the generated potential, although the combination may cause an unsafe, very
slippery surface.
You need to find a way to harness the potential energy that you have created
rather than just discharge it. How about a static electricity motor - I
think that John Galt knew something about this ...
Mike
s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
Nissequogue River, NY
From: "Just bent" <j.bulfer at jbtek.com> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 10:56
AM
>
> Went sailing yesterday in somewhat stormy weather. Had a great day. When
> we
> got back to the dock, when you touch the boat, you would get shocked. I
> unhooked the battery & still got shocked. Was it static electricity from
> the
> storm?
> Jb
>
> Jb http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01925.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01927.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01930.jpeg
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20422568/DSC01931.jpeg
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/question-about-electricity-tp20422568p20422568.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rhodes22-list mailing list
Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
End of Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 1674, Issue 2
**********************************************
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list